Re: [PATCH] Basic Support for Trace Compass

On 07/06/2019 07:21, Chris Johns wrote: Should we have something working before we make any additions to the user manual? It was actually my idea to add this section right now. My experience is that documentation which is planned at the end of the project is never written. Great and I also

Re: [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Fix mistakenly cleared PSR[EF] bit.

On 06/06/2019 18:11, Maksim Kozlov wrote: Hello, Sebastian I think that this patch is necessary in two reasons. In general view, if we have a conditional branch, we want, obviously, to invoke two instruction siquences with different results. Without this patch we clear EF bit in conditional

Re: [PATCH] Basic Support for Trace Compass

On 7/6/19 3:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 07/06/2019 05:40, Chris Johns wrote: >>> +Eclipse to analyse and display trace data graphically. Trace data can be >>> gathered from >>> +RTEMS applications via various means, for example: >>> + >>> +- :ref:`RTEMS Trace Linker ` >>> +- :ref:`RTEMS

Re: [PATCH] Basic Support for Trace Compass

On 07/06/2019 05:40, Chris Johns wrote: +Eclipse to analyse and display trace data graphically. Trace data can be gathered from +RTEMS applications via various means, for example: + +- :ref:`RTEMS Trace Linker ` +- :ref:`RTEMS Capture Engine ` +- :ref:`RTEMS Event Recording ` + +Event Recording

Re: [PATCH] Basic Support for Trace Compass

Thank you for switching to PlantUML. On 7/6/19 2:45 am, Ravindra Meena wrote: > --- > images/user/event-recording-trace.png | Bin 0 -> 7784 bytes > images/user/event-recording-trace.puml | 12 ++ > user/tracing/eventrecording.rst| 39 > - > 3

Re: [PATCH] Port ndbm

Please review the code so that I can send it to newlib-devel. On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 7:22 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > --- > newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h| 86 ++ > newlib/libc/posix/Makefile.am | 4 +- > newlib/libc/posix/ndbm.c | 214 ++ > 3

[PATCH] Port ndbm

--- newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h| 86 ++ newlib/libc/posix/Makefile.am | 4 +- newlib/libc/posix/ndbm.c | 214 ++ 3 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h create mode 100644

Re: CTF example

Hi Ravindra, My examples won't be helpful after all. I have some notes and scripts to convert from CTF to another format (PROV-DM), and I also have some examples using barectf to generate CTF traces. Let me know if you end up needing anything like that. Gedare On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 12:39 PM

Re: [PATCH] adding basic support for trace compass

Hi Sebastian, Chris I have sent the new patch on devel. This time I used PlantUML. I looked at other PlantUML files where the copyright thing was added. I haven't added the copyright thing. Thanks On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:43 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On

[PATCH] Basic Support for Trace Compass

--- images/user/event-recording-trace.png | Bin 0 -> 7784 bytes images/user/event-recording-trace.puml | 12 ++ user/tracing/eventrecording.rst| 39 - 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644

Re: [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Fix mistakenly cleared PSR[EF] bit.

Hello, Sebastian I think that this patch is necessary in two reasons. In general view, if we have a conditional branch, we want, obviously, to invoke two instruction siquences with different results. Without this patch we clear EF bit in conditional branch in any case and I think this is not

RTEMS on Banana Pi

Hi, I saw that RTEMS supports Cortex A7 processors, specifically the Raspberry Pi 2. So, I wondered if it would be possible to execute RTEMS on top of a Banana Pi since they use the same kind of processor. But I'm also concerned that the other hardware differences could complicate said

Re: [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Fix mistakenly cleared PSR[EF] bit.

Hello Maksim, On 06/06/2019 14:43, Maksim Kozlov wrote: On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 09:57, Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 05/06/2019 21:22, Maksim E. Kozlov wrote: > --- >   cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S | 3 ++- >   1 file changed, 2

[PATCH v2] sparc: Fix mistakenly cleared PSR[EF] bit.

--- cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S b/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S index 2f3ad24510..d5afd5f7b0 100644 --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S +++ b/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S @@ -681,7

Re: [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Fix mistakenly cleared PSR[EF] bit.

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 09:57, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 05/06/2019 21:22, Maksim E. Kozlov wrote: > > --- > > cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git

Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Fix missed restoring of PSR in syscall_lazy_fp_switch

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 09:43, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Maksim, > > thanks for the bug report and the fix. I added a ticket for it: > > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3756 > > I checked in a slightly modified patch: > > >

Re: [PATCH] adding basic support for trace compass

On 06/06/2019 13:09, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote: Hi Sebastian, Chris I created the Image online on https://www.draw.io/. Is it necessary to use Ditaa and PlantUML? Yes, this makes it easier to change the image later. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178

Re: [PATCH] adding basic support for trace compass

Hi Sebastian, Chris I created the Image online on https://www.draw.io/. Is it necessary to use Ditaa and PlantUML? Thanks On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:13 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 6/6/19 8:03 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello Chris, > > > > On 06/06/2019 11:54, Ravindra Meena wrote: > >>

Re: [PATCH] adding basic support for trace compass

On 6/6/19 8:03 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Chris, > > On 06/06/2019 11:54, Ravindra Meena wrote: >>   create mode 100644 images/user/event-recording-trace.png > > what is the desired way to include new images in the documentation? Should we > try to use PlantUML if possible? >

Re: [PATCH] adding basic support for trace compass

Hello Chris, On 06/06/2019 11:54, Ravindra Meena wrote: create mode 100644 images/user/event-recording-trace.png what is the desired way to include new images in the documentation? Should we try to use PlantUML if possible? -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr.

[PATCH] adding basic support for trace compass

--- images/user/event-recording-trace.png | Bin 0 -> 16508 bytes user/tracing/eventrecording.rst | 39 +- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 images/user/event-recording-trace.png diff --git

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 11:03 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 04/06/2019 19:26, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > I am in regular touch with Babeltrace community to figure out the > > solution for conversion of trace data into CTF. I came to

Re: [rtems-source-builder commit] 5: Update Newlib

On 06/06/2019 09:09, Chris Johns wrote: I am fine with the git hash being present. It does make it easy find the history given a tarball. You asked for a timeline. Even with rtems-gcc-7-fb371a33fa6-newlib-5c2a3661c rtems-gcc-7-32fc1a32aa6-newlib-5c2a3661c you don't know which GCC 7 branch

Re: [rtems-source-builder commit] 5: Update Newlib

On 6/6/19 5:01 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/06/2019 08:05, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 6/6/19 3:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 06/06/2019 02:23, Chris Johns wrote: On 5/6/19 10:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > +tools/rtems-gcc-fb371a33fa6-newlib-5c2a3661c Is there a timetable

Re: [rtems-source-builder commit] 5: Update Newlib

On 06/06/2019 08:05, Chris Johns wrote: On 6/6/19 3:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/06/2019 02:23, Chris Johns wrote: On 5/6/19 10:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: +tools/rtems-gcc-fb371a33fa6-newlib-5c2a3661c Is there a timetable for gcc 7 branch releases? I see the built gcc executable

Re: [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Fix mistakenly cleared PSR[EF] bit.

On 05/06/2019 21:22, Maksim E. Kozlov wrote: --- cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S b/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S index 2f3ad24510..69bbfb2748 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Fix missed restoring of PSR in syscall_lazy_fp_switch

Hello Maksim, thanks for the bug report and the fix. I added a ticket for it: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3756 I checked in a slightly modified patch: https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=a38187051863cf4a423c4f00669c6786bc8ff60d Would you mind reviewing it. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded

Re: [rtems-source-builder commit] 5: Update Newlib

On 6/6/19 3:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/06/2019 02:23, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 5/6/19 10:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> +tools/rtems-gcc-fb371a33fa6-newlib-5c2a3661c >> Is there a timetable for gcc 7 branch releases? I see the built gcc >> executable >> clearly shows the version of