Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add RTEID and ORKID references

On 19/6/19 9:17 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > + url = > {https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/joel/RTEID-ORKID/RTEID-2.1/RTEID-2_1.pdf} Should these be moved to https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/publications/RTEID-ORKID? Chris ___ devel

Re: [PATCH 2/2] fb and tda : port to RTEMS

On 19/06/2019 21:10, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:14 PM Christian Mauderer > wrote: > > Bit less adaptions than I thought that you have in the code. I assumed > that I would see some more locations in that patch where you

Re: [PATCH 2/2] fb and tda : port to RTEMS

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:14 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Bit less adaptions than I thought that you have in the code. I assumed > that I would see some more locations in that patch where you already > removed code blocks with ifdef __rtems__. I wanted to have a look > especially at these

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

*19th June work summary:* Forwarded the response received from babeltrace community. Tried to improve the metadata and sent the patch for the same for review. Attended the meeting on Freenode. -- *Ravindra Kumar Meena*, B. Tech. Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology

Re: [PATCH] port FB and TDA drivers

On 18/06/2019 21:53, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > This Patch series contains the patches to import and port > the drivers for FB and TDA from FreeBSD. This is not a working > patch and the purpose of sending the patch to the list is to > ask for a help regarding a build issue with the FB files

Re: [PATCH 2/2] fb and tda : port to RTEMS

Bit less adaptions than I thought that you have in the code. I assumed that I would see some more locations in that patch where you already removed code blocks with ifdef __rtems__. I wanted to have a look especially at these parts. I expect that you will have some problems with memories (like

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add RTEID and ORKID references

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:17 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > --- > c-user/preface.rst | 14 -- > common/refs.bib| 18 ++ > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/c-user/preface.rst b/c-user/preface.rst

[PATCH] CTF few event added

--- misc/CTF/record-ctf.ref | 73 misc/ctf/metadata | 145 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 misc/CTF/record-ctf.ref create mode 100644 misc/ctf/metadata diff --git

[PATCH] c-user: Add RTEID and ORKID references

--- c-user/preface.rst | 14 -- common/refs.bib| 18 ++ 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/c-user/preface.rst b/c-user/preface.rst index 47b030a..8723ed6 100644 --- a/c-user/preface.rst +++ b/c-user/preface.rst @@ -27,12 +27,14 @@ been

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

On 19/06/2019 12:02, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote: We have to turn record-client into something like this: target --> TCP stream with struct rtems_record_items -> client -> conversion -> CTF (metadata + event stream) -> files -> babeltrace -> human readable text Here in CTF (metadata + event

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

> > > Just to make sure we have a common understanding of the task. Could you > please explain the task with your ideas to implement it in your own works? > Sure. As of now, we have to deal with 10-bit event number. This is the same event recording infrastructure is using. We have to turn

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

On 19/06/2019 11:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 19/06/2019 11:13, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote: Hi, I asked the babeltrace community about the difference between binary packetized and the simple text metadata file. They say both will work the way. Here is the response:

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

On 19/06/2019 11:13, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote: Hi, I asked the babeltrace community about the difference between binary packetized and the simple text metadata file. They say both will work the way. Here is the response: https://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/2019-June/029059.html

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

Hi, I asked the babeltrace community about the difference between binary packetized and the simple text metadata file. They say both will work the way. Here is the response: https://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/2019-June/029059.html -- *Ravindra Kumar Meena*, B. Tech. Computer Science

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

> > > > Creating the metadata is one of the first actions a plugin > > must do > > > > > > Okay. > > > > > > I sent you one metadata file which had 1160 events. So should I > > add the > > > rtems 512 events in metadata? > > > > At the moment a