[PATCH] rtems: Remove RTEMS_MP_NOT_CONFIGURED error

Some objects can be created with a local or global scope in a multiprocessing network. In non-multiprocessing configurations setting the scope to local or global had no effect since such a system can be viewed as a multiprocessing network with just one node. One and all nodes is the same in such a

[PATCH] c-user: Remove RTEMS_MP_NOT_CONFIGURED error

Some objects can be created with a local or global scope in a multiprocessing network. In non-multiprocessing configurations setting the scope to local or global had no effect since such a system can be viewed as a multiprocessing network with just one node. One and all nodes is the same in such a

Re: Use of RTEMS_GLOBAL in non-multiprocessing configurations?

On 15/06/2020 20:23, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:28 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 15/06/2020 18:24, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/06/2020 18:13, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:52 AM

Re: Help in figuring out score objects in RTEMS and ticket #3131

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:29 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:46 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 7:34 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> For my GSoC project, user-configurable thread stack protection, I need to >>> track, allocate,

Re: GSoC 2020: [rtems/rsb]: Error while adding ptp support. This time building for xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu

If you want to get ahead, just make a version that already has a configure, then you can save yourself the trouble with autoconf. I'd put that in the back. Heinz > On 15. Jun 2020, at 20:46, Mritunjay Sharma > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The latest update is that by changing a couple of

Re: Use of RTEMS_GLOBAL in non-multiprocessing configurations?

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:30 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 1:01 PM Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 15/06/2020 18:28, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >> > On 15/06/2020 18:24, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> > >> >> On 15/06/2020 18:13, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mon,

Re: Use of RTEMS_GLOBAL in non-multiprocessing configurations?

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 1:01 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 15/06/2020 18:28, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 15/06/2020 18:24, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > >> On 15/06/2020 18:13, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:52 AM Sebastian

Re: Use of RTEMS_GLOBAL in non-multiprocessing configurations?

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:28 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 15/06/2020 18:24, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 15/06/2020 18:13, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:52 AM Sebastian Huber > >> >>

Re: Use of RTEMS_GLOBAL in non-multiprocessing configurations?

On 15/06/2020 18:28, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 15/06/2020 18:24, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 15/06/2020 18:13, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:52 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote:     Hello,     should the use of RTEMS_GLOBAL be an error

Re: Help in figuring out score objects in RTEMS and ticket #3131

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:46 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 7:34 PM Utkarsh Rai > wrote: > >> Hello, >> For my GSoC project, user-configurable thread stack protection, I need to >> track, allocate, and manipulate attributes of shared as well as protected >> stacks.

Re: Use of RTEMS_GLOBAL in non-multiprocessing configurations?

On 15/06/2020 18:24, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 15/06/2020 18:13, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:52 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote:     Hello,     should the use of RTEMS_GLOBAL be an error in     rtems_semaphore_create(),    

Re: Use of RTEMS_GLOBAL in non-multiprocessing configurations?

On 15/06/2020 18:13, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:52 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: Hello, should the use of RTEMS_GLOBAL be an error in rtems_semaphore_create(), rtems_task_create(), rtems_message_queue_create(), and

Re: Changes to libbsd for Applications?

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:44 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 15/06/2020 17:06, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > Lou put together a simple networked application example which was last > > touched back in January. It doesn't compile now. It appears that a > >

Re: Use of RTEMS_GLOBAL in non-multiprocessing configurations?

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:52 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > should the use of RTEMS_GLOBAL be an error in rtems_semaphore_create(), > rtems_task_create(), rtems_message_queue_create(), and > rtems_partition_create() if RTEMS was configured without

Re: [PATCH] Added APA terms

On 15/06/2020 16:38, Richi Dubey wrote: --- c-user/glossary.rst | 13 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c-user/glossary.rst b/c-user/glossary.rst index 86350a8..589d41b 100644 --- a/c-user/glossary.rst +++ b/c-user/glossary.rst @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ ..

Use of RTEMS_GLOBAL in non-multiprocessing configurations?

Hello, should the use of RTEMS_GLOBAL be an error in rtems_semaphore_create(), rtems_task_create(), rtems_message_queue_create(), and rtems_partition_create() if RTEMS was configured without multiprocessing enabled? ___ devel mailing list

Re: Changes to libbsd for Applications?

On 15/06/2020 17:06, Joel Sherrill wrote: Lou put together a simple networked application example which was last touched back in January. It doesn't compile now. It appears that a number of headers have moved so the network_inif.h file has at least a half dozen includes which don't work

Re: [PATCH rtems-tools] trace: Use c++14 instead of c++11 if possible

Ping. Currently shouldn't be a matter for much hosts (less than 20 including FreeBSD, Fedora, Arch, openSUSE according to distrowatch [1]) but I assume that llvm 10 will spread fast. [1] http://distrowatch.org/search.php?pkg=llvm=greaterequal=10=InLatest#pkgsearch On 08/06/2020 08:52,

Changes to libbsd for Applications?

Hi Lou put together a simple networked application example which was last touched back in January. It doesn't compile now. It appears that a number of headers have moved so the network_inif.h file has at least a half dozen includes which don't work now. I am attaching the files and would

Re: [PATCH] Added APA terms

Hi, Please ignore the first commit. I sent it directly from rtems-qual which was a mistake. Thanks On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:08 PM Richi Dubey wrote: > --- > c-user/glossary.rst | 13 - > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/c-user/glossary.rst

[PATCH] Added APA terms

--- c-user/glossary.rst | 13 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c-user/glossary.rst b/c-user/glossary.rst index 86350a8..589d41b 100644 --- a/c-user/glossary.rst +++ b/c-user/glossary.rst @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0 -..

[PATCH] Added APA terms

--- c-user/glossary.rst | 923 1 file changed, 923 insertions(+) create mode 100644 c-user/glossary.rst diff --git a/c-user/glossary.rst b/c-user/glossary.rst new file mode 100644 index 000..589d41b --- /dev/null +++ b/c-user/glossary.rst @@ -0,0

Re: Help in figuring out score objects in RTEMS and ticket #3131

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 7:34 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > Hello, > For my GSoC project, user-configurable thread stack protection, I need to > track, allocate, and manipulate attributes of shared as well as protected > stacks. Dr.Gedare suggested that tracking them with score objects would be > a

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

On 15/06/2020 14:33, Richi Dubey wrote: Hi, rtems_to_spec and ./spec2doc, both are giving similar error: $ ./spec2doc.py Traceback (most recent call last):   File "./spec2doc.py", line 41, in     main()   File "./spec2doc.py", line 37, in main    

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

Hi, rtems_to_spec and ./spec2doc, both are giving similar error: $ ./spec2doc.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "./spec2doc.py", line 41, in main() File "./spec2doc.py", line 37, in main rtemsqual.glossary.generate(config["glossary"], item_cache) File

[PATCH] c-user: Mention possible preemptions

Mention that object create/delete may case the calling task to be preempted due to the object allocator mutex. --- c-user/barrier_manager.rst | 6 +- c-user/dual_ports_memory_manager.rst | 8 +--- c-user/message_manager.rst | 6 +- c-user/partition_manager.rst

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

On 15/06/2020 13:32, Richi Dubey wrote: Thanks for your quick response. I am getting the following error: richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ git pull Already up to date. richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ ./spec2doc.py   File "./spec2doc.py", line 31     def main() -> None:                ^

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

Hi, Thanks for your quick response. I am getting the following error: richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ git pull Already up to date. richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ ./spec2doc.py File "./spec2doc.py", line 31 def main() -> None: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Is it because

Re: Help in figuring out score objects in RTEMS and ticket #3131

With the help of Dr.Gedare and a bit of digging, I was able to understand the file system design concept in RTEMS. This is what I was able to gather- > The object-oriented design of the file system refers to the fact that the virtual file-system layer provides a framework upon which different