Re: [PATCH 6/7] score: Always validate ticks in _TOD_Validate()

On 7/9/21 3:34 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 07/09/2021 05:11, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 6/9/21 6:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 06/09/2021 09:55, Chris Johns wrote: On 6/9/21 3:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 04/09/2021 06:20, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>    > -    sc =

Re: Does the arm/xilinx-zynqmp BSP work?

On 8/9/21 4:43 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > This bit of information also applies to the aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp BSP, but > starting recommendation for that is to use the prebuilt u-boot BOOT.bin which > includes the ATF bl31 binary and so it isn't critical knowledge for getting > started. Thank you

Ticket 4503

I was wondering about ticket 4503. I was wondering where The required functionality should be in the underlying score/ capability used can be found to write this function. Also how does this relate to Add common malloc family extension method malloc_usable_size()

Re: [PATCH] improve the format error reporting on i386

- thread id is printed as a hex value - EBP ESP is now printed as a address pointer %p - Program counter is printed as a pinter Part of ticket #4203 On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 00:17, Zacchaeus Leung wrote: > --- > cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3

[PATCH] improve the format error reporting on i386

--- cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c b/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c index 77b7a7161c..3c5b7db316 100644 --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c +++ b/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void

Re: [PATCH RSB v2 2/2] rtems-gcc-head-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch

On 8/9/21 4:08 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Has this issue been raised with newlib? I didn't see anything on their > ml. The temporary workaround is fine with me. I would like to understand how temporary this will be. Chris ___ devel mailing list

Re: [PATCH RSB] rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch

On 8/9/21 3:27 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021, 12:18 PM Mr. Andrei Chichak > wrote: > > Hey Joel, > > I don’t suppose this update will be in the places where the build system > decides on the instruction set that newlib uses for

Re: Does the arm/xilinx-zynqmp BSP work?

I know of someone who has run this BSP on hardware and I'm not aware of any usage with xen (though it could very well be the case). It really needs more documentation which is something I guess I should sit down and do at some point. The ILP32 AArch64 BSP isn't a direct replacement for this

RE: [PATCH RSB v2 2/2] rtems-gcc-head-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch

Kinsey got the fix merged upstream from newlib, so now we just have to wait till newlib pulls those changes. -Original Message- From: Gedare Bloom Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 1:09 PM To: Ryan Long Cc: devel@rtems.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RSB v2 2/2] rtems-gcc-head-newlib-head.cfg:

Re: Does the arm/xilinx-zynqmp BSP work?

Hi Chris, What I understand about the arm/xilinx-zynqmp BSP is that it was made to run RTEMS paravirtualized under Xen. It drops into aarch32 mode. It probably can be replaced by the aarch64 version using the ilp32 once that is stable, and someone can confirm the PV use case works. Gedare On

Re: [PATCH RSB v2 2/2] rtems-gcc-head-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch

Has this issue been raised with newlib? I didn't see anything on their ml. The temporary workaround is fine with me. On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ryan Long wrote: > > Adds patch to add the -DPREFER_SIZE_OVER_SPEED flag to AArch64 tools > builds with newlib. This forces the generation of

Re: [PATCH RSB] rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021, 12:18 PM Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: > Hey Joel, > > I don’t suppose this update will be in the places where the build system > decides on the instruction set that newlib uses for Cortex-M4 > No. This one is just to patch over a big in some of the aarch64 assembly

Re: [PATCH RSB] rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch

Hey Joel, I don’t suppose this update will be in the places where the build system decides on the instruction set that newlib uses for Cortex-M4 A > On 2021-September-07, at 08:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ryan Long wrote: >> >> Alright, I’ll have that in

Re: [PATCH RSB] rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ryan Long wrote: > > Alright, I’ll have that in the next version. I have a patch ready for this and already posted. Just ran out of disk space testing it on all architectures on CentOS. When that build finishes, unless someone complains, I will push it. --joel

RE: [PATCH RSB] rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch

Alright, I’ll have that in the next version. From: Joel Sherrill Sent: Saturday, September 4, 2021 3:31 PM To: Chris Johns Cc: Ryan Long ; rtems-de...@rtems.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RSB] rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch On Fri, Sep 3, 2021, 9:05 PM Chris Johns