On 20/11/2021 19:58, Gedare Bloom wrote:
A bit unrelated, these two functions could be refactored/merged, with
a callout function passed in to select either _Scheduler_SMP_Preempt()
or _Scheduler_SMP_Allocate_processor().
Later these functions are changed again. The loop is very similar,
On 20/11/2021 21:09, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:13 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
If a node is moved from the scheduled chain to the ready queue, then we
know that it is the highest priority ready node. So, it can be
prepended to the ready queue without doing any comparisons.
On 20/11/2021 19:36, Gedare Bloom wrote:
+void _RBTree_Append( RBTree_Control *the_rbtree, RBTree_Node *the_node )
+{
+ RBTree_Node **link;
+ RBTree_Node *parent;
+
+ link = _RBTree_Root_reference( the_rbtree );
+ parent = NULL;
+
+ while ( *link != NULL ) {
+parent = *link;
+link
On 11/21/21 2:21 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021, 6:50 PM Karel Gardas wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> indeed, centos 7 is bundled with gcc 4.8.5. Now, the question is, is
> centos 7 still supported by RTEMS? If so, then we will need to invent
> some machinery to
On 21/11/21 12:21 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021, 6:50 PM Karel Gardas wrote:
>> indeed, centos 7 is bundled with gcc 4.8.5. Now, the question is, is
>> centos 7 still supported by RTEMS? If so, then we will need to invent
>> some machinery to check not only for commands but also
