Thanks.
FYI I am testing a series now to add a surprisingly large number of missing
BSPs to the ini files. Not having aarch64, microblaze, or x86_64 is forgivable.
--joel
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 4:00 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> OK
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
> On 19/1/22 5:17 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
OK
Thanks
Chris
On 19/1/22 5:17 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Updates #4302.
> ---
> config/rtems-bsps-powerpc.ini | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-powerpc.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-powerpc.ini
> index b4dc02c..fc69827 100644
> ---
Ok to push.
Thank you
Chris
On 19/1/22 3:19 am, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> Hardware test results have recently been posted for AArch64.
>
> Closes #4581
> ---
> config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini
Updates #4302.
---
config/rtems-bsps-powerpc.ini | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-powerpc.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-powerpc.ini
index b4dc02c..fc69827 100644
--- a/config/rtems-bsps-powerpc.ini
+++ b/config/rtems-bsps-powerpc.ini
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
bsps =
On 18/01/2022 17:19, Kinsey Moore wrote:
Hardware test results have recently been posted for AArch64.
Closes #4581
It would be nice if you could run also the new validation tests on this
branch:
https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git/log/?h=validation
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian
Hardware test results have recently been posted for AArch64.
Closes #4581
---
config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini
index 875c5df..ba9e6b5 100644
---
Hello,
I noted that I still have this patch set open. I first posted it in
August 2021 and later pinged it in September 2021. Both times no
conclusion has been found. I would like to finally finish this topic and
get the patches in an acceptable state. To simplify it a bit, let's only
On 18/01/2022 02:20, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/1/22 8:51 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 17/01/2022 09:47, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/1/22 7:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 17/01/2022 08:52, Chris Johns wrote:
My understanding of the status of these patches is the remaining topic is the
release
Am 14.01.22 um 17:52 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
BSP-specific looks ok to me. Back port to 5 is also fine as bugfix.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:38 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
Hello,
the UART/USART of the ATSAM doesn't have any FIFO buffer. Therefore
every received character has to be
