[PATCH 2/2] kern_ntptime.c: Port to RTEMS

Remove previous adjtime() implementation. Update #2348. --- cpukit/include/rtems/score/timecounter.h | 9 ++ cpukit/include/sys/timex.h| 4 +- cpukit/posix/src/adjtime.c| 93 --- cpukit/score/src/kern_ntptime.c | 138

[PATCH 0/2] Add NTP support

This is a draft patch set which imports the FreeBSD NTP support and ports it to RTEMS. The PPS synchronization support is disabled. Sebastian Huber (2): kern_ntptime.c: Import form FreeBSD kern_ntptime.c: Port to RTEMS cpukit/include/rtems/score/timecounter.h |9 +

[PATCH 1/2] kern_ntptime.c: Import from FreeBSD

The file was imported from this repository: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd.git This commit was used: commit 3ec0dc367bff27c345ad83240625b2057af391b9 Author: Sebastian Huber Date: Mon Feb 7 14:16:16 2022 -0700 kern_ntptime.c: Remove ntp_init() The ntp_init() function did set a

Re: [PATCH rtems-release] Add termios changes to rtems-notes-5

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:04 AM Christian MAUDERER wrote: > > Hello Joel, > > Am 08.02.22 um 14:59 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > > Looks good to me. > > Thanks. > > > > > Is there anything in the bsp.and device drivers guide about this? > > I haven't found anything about the line discipline or about

Re: [PATCH rtems-release] Add termios changes to rtems-notes-5

Hello Joel, Am 08.02.22 um 14:59 schrieb Joel Sherrill: Looks good to me. Thanks. Is there anything in the bsp.and device drivers guide about this? I haven't found anything about the line discipline or about the l_start function in the docs. rtems_termios_tty is mentioned in three

Re: [PATCH rtems-release] Add termios changes to rtems-notes-5

Looks good to me. Is there anything in the bsp.and device drivers guide about this? On Tue, Feb 8, 2022, 6:54 AM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Update #4494 > --- > > This adds a paragraph to the release notes like discussed here: > >

[PATCH rtems-release] Add termios changes to rtems-notes-5

Update #4494 --- This adds a paragraph to the release notes like discussed here: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2022-February/070455.html Is that OK. Should I add more details? rtems-notes-5.txt | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/rtems-notes-5.txt

Re: [rtems-libbsd commit] sys/kern: Add VFS support

On 8/2/22 12:48 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Chris, > > sorry, this slipped through may review list. Thanks for the review. > > On 02/09/2021 04:43, Chris Johns wrote: >> @@ -1232,9 +993,6 @@ osendmsg(struct thread *td, struct osendmsg_args *uap) >>   #endif >>   #endif /* __rtems__ */

[PATCH 1/2] bsp/atsam/i2c: Simplify driver

Do some clean ups. Remove superfluous variables. Eliminate some overly complex logic (information about transfer and remaining bytes has been tracked redundantly in multiple variables). This patch doesn't change the behavior of the driver. Update #4591 --- bsps/arm/atsam/i2c/atsam_i2c_bus.c

[PATCH 2/2] bsp/atsam/i2c: Add error return and fix edge cases

The driver didn't return with an error on (for example) a NACK on the bus. This adds the expected error return. Due to the new case that a transfer can be interrupted on an error, there were some new edge cases. This patch therefore also fixes these edge cases by removing the transfer_state that

[PATCH 0/2] bsp/atsam/i2c: Fix error return

Hello, this patch set fixes a missing error return for the I2C driver of the ATSAM BSP. If no one objects, I would like to apply it to master and 5: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4591 https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4592 Best regards Christian ___