OK to push
Thanks
Chris
On 21/12/2022 3:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> The ports did not get contributed until during 6 development and are
> not on this release branch.
>
> Closes #4555.
> ---
> rtems/config/5/rtems-aarch64.bset| 4
> rtems/config/5/rtems-all.bset| 2 --
>
On 21/12/2022 3:44 am, Frank Kuehndel wrote:
> From: Frank Kühndel
>
> Close #4642
> ---
> source-builder/sb/ereport.py | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/source-builder/sb/ereport.py b/source-builder/sb/ereport.py
> index d8fb5f6..d391917 100755
> ---
From: Frank Kühndel
Hello Chris,
I am making an attempt to close my bug report #4642
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4642
"RSB: log.py tends removes relevant error messages".
The difficulty seems to be to find a rather short text indicating
that the relevant error can sometimes be so far way
From: Frank Kühndel
Close #4642
---
source-builder/sb/ereport.py | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/source-builder/sb/ereport.py b/source-builder/sb/ereport.py
index d8fb5f6..d391917 100755
--- a/source-builder/sb/ereport.py
+++ b/source-builder/sb/ereport.py
@@ -55,6
The ports did not get contributed until during 6 development and are
not on this release branch.
Closes #4555.
---
rtems/config/5/rtems-aarch64.bset| 4
rtems/config/5/rtems-all.bset| 2 --
rtems/config/5/rtems-microblaze.bset | 3 ---
3 files changed, 9 deletions(-)
delete
Correctly calculate the array index and shift value in
_Processor_mask_To_uint32_t(). The bugs had no impact yet since this
function was always called with a zero value for the index in RTEMS.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/processormask.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
Fix _Processor_mask_To_uint32_t() for targets which use a 64-bit long
type. This bug had no impact yet since there are no systems with more
than 32 processors known supporting RTEMS.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/processormask.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
