From: Tian Ye
---
cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/aarch64-exception-frame-print.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/aarch64-exception-frame-print.c
b/cpukit/score/cpu/aarch64/aarch64-exception-frame-print.c
index e207a5a81d..c5b477c72f 100644
Results from cppcheck
cpukit/include/sys/timetc.h:17:0: error: #error "no user-serviceable
parts inside" [preprocessorErrorDirective]
#error "no user-serviceable parts inside"
^
testsuites/samples/capture/test1.c:97:5: error: Uninitialized
variable: i [uninitvar]
i++;
^
Thanks Alex,
I was able to run cppcheck.
I had to install the newest cppcheck from source to get access to the
--project flag.
i ran
bear ./waf
and then
cppcheck --project=compile_commands.json
It returned a few static analysis errors if interested.
I'll attach the results when it finishes
Not sure if this helps but here is the script used to run Coverity
https://github.com/joelsherrill/rtems-cron-helpers/blob/main/rtems-run-coverity
On Mon, May 15, 2023, 10:03 AM Alex White wrote:
> You should be able to use `bear` (https://github.com/rizsotto/Bear). I
> have it installed via
On 15/5/2023 6:13 pm, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Am 15.05.23 um 05:18 schrieb Chris Johns:
>>
>>
>> On 6/5/2023 2:02 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 9:02 AM wrote:
Hello Gedare,
thanks for taking a look at the patch set.
Am
Use of this method was likely eliminated during the rework to use
FreeBSD bintime/sbintime.
Close #4905.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/todimpl.h | 15
cpukit/score/src/coretodadjust.c | 73
spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml| 1 -
3 files
Use of this method was likely eliminated during the rework to use
FreeBSD bintime/sbintime.
Close #4905.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/todimpl.h | 15 ---
spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml| 1 -
2 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/todimpl.h
You should be able to use `bear` (https://github.com/rizsotto/Bear). I have it
installed via my package manager.
After a `./waf clean`, run `bear -- ./waf` to generate compile_commands.json.
Then you should be able to run `cppcheck --project=compile_commands.json`.
Alex
I'm fine with the v2 now, thanks for reducing it. Do feel free to
start a separate discussion / ticket about how we should handle HALs.
I think this problem will only get worse not better.
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:11 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> this is the second version of the
Sorry for the delays. These patches look fine now other than a few
small things that can be fixed either on check-in or cleaning up
later.
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 11:21 PM wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks again for the feedback. I've improved the implementation of the
> bit allocator in line with
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 11:21 PM wrote:
>
> From: Aaron Nyholm
>
> ---
> spec/build/testsuites/libtests/flashdev01.yml | 20 ++
> spec/build/testsuites/libtests/grp.yml| 2 +
> testsuites/libtests/flashdev01/flashdev01.doc | 11 +
> testsuites/libtests/flashdev01/flashdev01.scn |
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 11:20 PM wrote:
>
> From: Aaron Nyholm
>
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/shellconfig.h | 7 +
> cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_flashdev.c | 592 +++
> spec/build/cpukit/objshell.yml | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 600 insertions(+)
> create mode
Hello Chris,
Am 15.05.23 um 05:18 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 6/5/2023 2:02 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 9:02 AM wrote:
Hello Gedare,
thanks for taking a look at the patch set.
Am 05.05.23 um 15:56 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:01 AM Christian Mauderer
13 matches
Mail list logo
