Hi
Noticed these building RTEMS for powerpc/psim today. SMP is disabled
In file included from ../../../cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/intr.h:73,
from ../../../cpukit/include/rtems.h:69,
from ../../../testsuites/sptests/spstdc17/init.c:32:
Hello
On 04.08.23 07:07, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 04.08.23 00:43, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/8/2023 10:17 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Build the arm libdebugger support only for supported ARM architectures.
What ARM archs are not supported?
At least ARMv7-M and everything with Thumb 1.
Is
This looks ok to commit.
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 2:59 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Make sure we have enough POSIX key value pairs available. This fixes a
> test
> failure on some targets.
>
> Make objects and functions static. Initialize variable to get rid
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 2:59 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Make sure we have enough POSIX key value pairs available. This fixes a
> test
> failure on some targets.
>
> Make objects and functions static. Initialize variable to get rid of
> warnings.
> ---
>
On 04.08.23 12:15, EYSSARTIER Kevin wrote:
I agree that my solution is not good but moving
_RISCV_Start_multitasking out of the ‘#ifdef RTEMS_SMP’ barrier seems to
bring many side effects.
You have to provide this function for all configurations, however, with
different implementations.
--
Classified as: {OPEN}
I don't know how to run the tests.
I observe that _Thread_Do_dispatch fails with
INTERNAL_ERROR_BAD_THREAD_DISPATCH_ENVIRONMENT because
RTEMS_SCORE_ROBUST_THREAD_DISPATCH is activated and the _ISR_Is_enabled returns
false.
Indeed, the _CPU_Start_multitasking should be
Make sure we have enough POSIX key value pairs available. This fixes a test
failure on some targets.
Make objects and functions static. Initialize variable to get rid of warnings.
---
testsuites/psxtests/psxkey07/init.c | 42 ++---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22
On 04.08.23 08:30, Chris Johns wrote:
Please understand there is a limited number people reviewing and it takes time.
I am blocked on the other changes you have recently posted. Adding which hosts
you have built and tested this change on would help?
Sorry, Joel is rushing for the RTEMS 6
On 04.08.23 08:22, Chris Johns wrote:
On 4/8/2023 3:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 04.08.23 00:27, Chris Johns wrote:
On 2/8/2023 6:49 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
> I am concerned about the compatibility to the ecosystem we have. Have you
built
all the tests in the testsuite with this value
On 4/8/2023 3:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 04.08.23 00:53, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 3/8/2023 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Ping.
>>
>> Which repo? Is this in the rtems-tools repo?
>
> Yes, the rtems-tools.
>
Thanks
> Please understand there is a limited number people reviewing and
On 4/8/2023 3:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 04.08.23 00:43, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 3/8/2023 10:17 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Build the arm libdebugger support only for supported ARM architectures.
>> What ARM archs are not supported?
>
> At least ARMv7-M and everything with Thumb 1.
>
On 4/8/2023 3:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 04.08.23 00:27, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 2/8/2023 6:49 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
>> > I am concerned about the compatibility to the ecosystem we have. Have you
>> built
>>> all the tests in the testsuite with this value set to something that is not
12 matches
Mail list logo
