On 21/3/2024 5:39 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:> On 21.03.24 00:28, Chris Johns
wrote:
>> On 21/3/2024 2:11 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 19.03.24 18:44, Chris Johns wrote:
On 20/3/2024 2:03 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 19.03.24 14:50, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>> The xilinx-zynqmp-rpu
Generally this looks ok to me, but please update
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/bsp-howto/clock.html#initialization
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/bsp-howto/clock.html#support-at-tick
to explain how this arg works.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 8:29 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Pass
Two basic questions:
Does the priority field type need to be Architecture- or BSP-defined
or is uint32_t always going to be fine.
Does changing (increasing) the priority of a vector from within
interrupt context possibly cause a pending interrupt to post that was
previously at a lower priority
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:06 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 21.03.24 15:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Isn't this content generated from rtems-central?
>
> Yes, it is generated.
>
> >
> > Shouldn't there also be a change there?
>
> It should be there:
>
OK.
On 21.03.24 15:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Isn't this content generated from rtems-central?
Yes, it is generated.
Shouldn't there also be a change there?
It should be there:
Module:rtems-central
Branch:master
Commit:f5e42e5d9fae95e50f41a2ed71ee94e9908612c0
Changeset:
Isn't this content generated from rtems-central?
Shouldn't there also be a change there?
--joel
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:24 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Close #4986.
> ---
> c-user/config/general.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On 21.03.24 00:28, Chris Johns wrote:
On 21/3/2024 2:11 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 19.03.24 18:44, Chris Johns wrote:
On 20/3/2024 2:03 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 19.03.24 14:50, Kinsey Moore wrote:
The xilinx-zynqmp-rpu bsp_reset() is modified, but not included in the spec
file for
