propsal for gsoc

2024-03-30 Thread ashish ashish
hello i have written my proposal and needs your valuable suggestion and feedbacks propsal ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

Re: GSOC proposal - new POSIX APIs 2024

2024-03-30 Thread Abhinav Srivastava
Hi! Requesting comments on my proposal for GSOC 2024 - implementing new POSIX APIs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iwgzx72TZ0aokNLww-y-IlyEkaRCovjGUhpdQXdP9mg/edit?usp=sharing Abhinav. -- *"Free society* *Has, at its core, privacy* *You must act in trust." - *Salyzyn

Re: PowerPC e7400 executable is type powerpc:e500 making debug difficult

2024-03-30 Thread Peter Dufault
> On Mar 30, 2024, at 2:15 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > It also leads to dead/unused code in any deployment whose BSP uses this file > I don't know the full definition of code coverage. I suppose code that can never be exercised on a given platform is "dead code"? Even if the code as a

Re: PowerPC e7400 executable is type powerpc:e500 making debug difficult

2024-03-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024, 12:18 PM Peter Dufault wrote: > It's the source code lines that I quoted that cause the problem. > > To avoid getting the object defined as an e500 then that file needs to be > conditionally compiled (I think that's the way it is, there should be > another way, having a

Re: PowerPC e7400 executable is type powerpc:e500 making debug difficult

2024-03-30 Thread Peter Dufault
It's the source code lines that I quoted that cause the problem. To avoid getting the object defined as an e500 then that file needs to be conditionally compiled (I think that's the way it is, there should be another way, having a binary that adapts to its target isn't *that* evil.). Including

Re: approve google docs editing request

2024-03-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
You do not edit the master proposal template. You make a copy of it and turn it into your proposal. --joel On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 12:29 AM ashish ashish wrote: > I requested on google docs for editing to write my proposal. and it needs > approval. > please approve it. > request with email: