This configuration file was missing for the mipstx39 gdb build for the
head/7 tools.
Closes #4935.
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-mipstx39-gdb-head.bset | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 rtems/config/tools/rtems-mipstx39-gdb-head.bset
diff --git
Ok. Push this.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023, 9:19 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 03.11.23 14:56, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Does this mean that anything under tests and bsps will not have coverage?
>
> The tests itself are built without covera
Seems reasonable.
Does this mean that anything under tests and bsps will not have coverage?
--joel
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 3:58 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> The goal is to get code and branch coverage from actual tests and not
> the test support itself.
>
Seems ok.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 3:58 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Move the RTEMS test printer and rtems_test_exit() to separate files, to
> remove dependencies from the begin/end test messsage support.
>
> Update #4963.
> ---
> cpukit/libtest/testbeginend.c
I noted a few cases where I don't think the value used is interesting
enough or an edge case. Hopefully I caught them all.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 7:12 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Test more compiler builtins which may use integer library routins:
>
routines.
Sorry. Not sure how this kept slipping through the cracks. The 13
September ping did coincide with me being on a trip and then sick.
This is the only revision I see in my inbox. There is an email which says
"how about this version?" but I don't see anything on it.
A few comments inline.
On
What caused all the recently posted tool build failures?
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, 4:52 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> Ok to all patches in the series. Thanks for newlib changes for ARM, they
> will be
> nice to use.
>
> Chris
>
> On 10/10/2023 3:58 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > Pick up latest changes
Random thought. Is there a gnat1? Can you build a native Ada hello world?
I'm not sure what that configure check is trying but looking at that is the
next step.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023, 12:02 PM emanuel stiebler wrote:
> I just tried to compile the tools for rtems6,
> and just with "C",
---
cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/fat_fat_operations.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/fat_fat_operations.c
b/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/fat_fat_operations.c
index 24a408f9c7..1d94beb26a 100644
---
Hi
Vijay and I will be attending the Google Summer of Code Mentor Summit the
weekend of October 14-15. We are planning to fly out a bit early to give us
a chance to schedule visits with RTEMS users, see your project in action as
a site visit, and just have the opportunity to talk about your
Are we doing something that particularly requires C++17? AFAIK we haven't
needed it yet and why wouldn't it also be needed with gcc? If the default
on recent gcc versions is that, ok but we should be precise in case an
older gcc with a different default is used.
This may also eliminate some
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 4:33 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 14.09.23 10:51, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 14/9/2023 5:58 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> On 14.09.23 09:38, Chris Johns wrote:
> > The issue I faced was no score interface to get the TLS base
Thanks Sam. This is now committed.
--joel
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:35 AM Sam Price wrote:
> This patch fixes a spelling/rename mistake in rtems-tools.
>
> ---
> tester/rt/stty.py | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tester/rt/stty.py b/tester/rt/stty.py
>
-3ea0c249346fda427bf0d3c169aa3e7c2a521df8/build
invalid version file: module 'shlex' has no attribute 'join'
Not sure what the common factor on all this is.
--joel
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 8:23 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 5:48 AM Frank Kühndel <
> frank.kuehn...@embedded-b
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 5:48 AM Frank Kühndel <
frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> On 8/29/23 12:45, Chris Johns wrote:
> >> On 29 Aug 2023, at 6:24 pm, Frank Kühndel<
> frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Chris,
> >>
> >> our continuous
Looks ok to push
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023, 9:14 PM wrote:
> From: Chris Johns
>
> Updates #4951
> ---
> rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg
> b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg
>
Done.
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 8:57 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 22/8/2023 10:02 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > flag it as a false positive.
>
> I agree.
>
> > g7 is a global register that is reserved for system / compiler use in
> > the sparc ABI
>
> The reigster is set up by the operating system
val; })
I honestly don't know how to tell Coverity or GCC that this is reading a
register we trust.
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 2:58 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi
>
> It is code from somewhere else so sorry I have no idea.
>
> Chris
>
> On 21 Aug 2023, at 11:33 pm, Joel Sherrill wrot
---
.../score/cpu/x86_64/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 14 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/x86_64/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/x86_64/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index e0e301b6bc..726a515d4e 100644
---
---
cpukit/score/cpu/sparc64/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc64/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc64/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index c49c637805..a29a519644 100644
---
---
cpukit/score/cpu/sh/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/sh/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/sh/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index 3e37c8f57d..ca87c61c2b 100644
---
---
cpukit/score/cpu/v850/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/v850/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/v850/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index 5ec528961c..3985c3cdb9 100644
---
---
cpukit/score/cpu/mips/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/mips/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/mips/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index ad6b7ae615..d619eb6213 100644
---
---
cpukit/score/cpu/m68k/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/m68k/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/m68k/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index ec90a41ae2..4bee157215 100644
---
---
cpukit/score/cpu/moxie/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/moxie/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/moxie/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index 8ded8c34e9..30c2c75f2b 100644
---
---
cpukit/score/cpu/lm32/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/lm32/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/lm32/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index 679ef452f4..870640864c 100644
---
---
cpukit/score/cpu/bfin/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/bfin/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/bfin/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index 05628a2c0b..aaf34a3ce0 100644
---
---
cpukit/score/cpu/i386/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index f0e4088218..ba5d820016 100644
---
Some of the architecture ports do not have implementations of
the context validation methods. The stubs do not reference the
parameter. This series of patches addresses that.
I separated them so each port is distinct.
--joel
Joel Sherrill (10):
bfin/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h: Address
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, 8:30 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 17/8/2023 6:34 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:05 PM wrote:
> >>
> >> These patches add support to rtems.git and rtems-tools.git to
> >> provide access to TLS variables in the base from loaded code.
> >> The changes
Looks ok. I will adjust the message so it closes the ticket.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 7:48 PM zack wrote:
> diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/regulator/regulator.c
> b/cpukit/libmisc/regulator/regulator.c
> index 2071c468fd..97a48be4f5 100644
> --- a/cpukit/libmisc/regulator/regulator.c
> +++
This looks ok.
Piling on Chris' comments about where is the requirement for this. This is
a topic which must be addressed in the Software Engineering Guide and
accepted before it can be put into practices. A software development
process of any quality cannot be changed on a whim without
Hi
Some BSPs define this in bsp.h or irq.h or similar. I see redefinition
warnings on psim. Where should this be defined?
bsps]$ grep -r BSP_SHARED_HANDLER_SUPPORT | grep define
i386/include/bsp/irq.h:#define BSP_SHARED_HANDLER_SUPPORT 1
mips/csb350/include/bsp.h:#define
Thanks. If you do turn up something once it is merged, there is always the
option to fix it. :)
Chris said I addressed his bigger concerns. Deletion and statistics.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:32 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 11.08.23 00:14, Joel
I should have asked if you want another round of patches or just go ahead
and merge. This set of changes was pretty minor.
--joel
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 5:13 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I think I have addressed all of your comments and Chris'.
>
> The conversion to rtems-central migh
I think I have addressed all of your comments and Chris'.
The conversion to rtems-central might be nice but it isn't going to happen
soon.
--joel
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 12:10 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 09.08.23 17:42, Joel Sherrill wrote:
&g
It looks ok but why? It isn't built if not supported. It isn't a lot of
code even if it is built. And it will not be in a user executable if they
don't call it.
I just don't see the point.
--joel
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 6:03 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> ---
Vijay.. go ahead and push this if you don't mind.
I was just wondering if we could make a blanket statement that all
motorola_powerpc variants need this flag.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 11:41 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
&g
Reading the EPICS discussion, I wonder if this should be added for all
motorola_powerpc BSP variants.
Gedare/Chris/anyone with another board in the family? What do you think?
--joel
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 11:14 AM Uchenna Ezeobi
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 9:22 AM Joel Sherrill wr
CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PARTITIONS 1
+#define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PERIODS 1
+
+#define CONFIGURE_UNIFIED_WORK_AREAS
+#define CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_TASK_STACK_SIZE (8 * 1024)
+
+#define CONFIGURE_INIT
+#include
diff --git a/misc/regulator/wscript b/misc/regulator/wscript
new file mode 100644
index 000..4a4f8de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mis
---
README.txt | 19 +-
c-user/index.rst| 1 +
c-user/regulator/background.rst | 90
c-user/regulator/directives.rst | 549
c-user/regulator/index.rst | 19 +
Updates #4924.
The Regulator is an application support class which is used to
deal with the scenario where there is a bursty input source
which needs to be metered out to a destination sink. The maximum
size of bursts needs to be known and the delivery method must
be configured to deliver
to the Classic API Guide.
Joel Sherrill (1):
Add the Regulator Interface and test
cpukit/include/rtems/regulator.h | 499 +++
cpukit/include/rtems/regulatorimpl.h | 135 ++
cpukit/libmisc/regulator/regulator.c | 683 +
spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml
I'm ok with this if there is a known case of an alignment exception that
causes this.
We didn't want to force it into every PowerPC BSP.
Do you have a case that failed and was resolved by adding this?
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 7:36 AM Uchenna Ezeobi
wrote:
> Update #3767
> ---
>
Looks ok to push.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:37 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Print the full test information.
> ---
> testsuites/samples/iostream/init.cc | 9 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
I'm ok with this. Push it.
On Sat, Aug 5, 2023, 1:27 PM Karel Gardas wrote:
> Fixes #4938.
> ---
> bare/config/textproc/gsed-4.9.cfg | 12
> bare/config/textproc/gsed.cfg | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644
Hi
Noticed these building RTEMS for powerpc/psim today. SMP is disabled
In file included from ../../../cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/intr.h:73,
from ../../../cpukit/include/rtems.h:69,
from ../../../testsuites/sptests/spstdc17/init.c:32:
This looks ok to commit.
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 2:59 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Make sure we have enough POSIX key value pairs available. This fixes a
> test
> failure on some targets.
>
> Make objects and functions static. Initialize variable to get rid
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 2:59 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Make sure we have enough POSIX key value pairs available. This fixes a
> test
> failure on some targets.
>
> Make objects and functions static. Initialize variable to get rid of
> warnings.
> ---
>
history with some of these static analysis triggered
fixes where
they are hard to get right.
--joel
>
> Best regards
>
> Christian
>
> On 2023-08-02 13:43, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Ok but out the Coverity Id number in the commit long message
> >
> > On Wed, A
Ok but out the Coverity Id number in the commit long message
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 1:17 AM Christian Mauderer <
christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Coverity warns that (buf[...] & 0x7) can't be bigger than 7. This patch
> removes the unnecessary comparison.
> ---
>
New Coverity issue
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 12:22 AM
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS
To:
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to RTEMS found
with Coverity Scan.
1 new defect(s) introduced to RTEMS
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 2:52 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, 12:20 Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, 11:41 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ---
>>> bsps/powerpc/mvme3100/start/bspc
Thanks for the submission. It's a bit hard to review with the patches as
attachments rather than having been sent via git send-email but here goes.
Hopefully someone with more RISC-V knowledge can comment also.
0001 - long comment appears to be one line. Please break into multiple
lines.
0001
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, 11:41 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> ---
> bsps/powerpc/mvme3100/start/bspclean.c| 25 +++
> .../bsps/powerpc/mvme3100/bspmvme3100.yml | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 bsps/powerpc/mvme3100/start/bspclean.c
>
>
yet and fix is
> already awaiting review here:
>
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2023-July/076043.html
>
> If you ok that, I may push...
>
> Thanks,
> Karel
>
>
> On 8/1/23 15:55, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > I think this started b
I think this started before the fix was pushed but since there is no hash
in this report, it is impossible to be sure.
Since it already has to know about the rtems source tree, could it include
a hash? How hard is that to implement?
--joel
-- Forwarded message -
From: OAR Tester
Generally looks good. We may have to discuss my renode script comments on
Discord.
It would be nice to have comments and licenses in them but may not be
possible.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 9:09 PM Muhammad Sulthan Mazaya <
msulthanmaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add leon3 implementation for rtems-test
rel
>
> On 7/27/23 19:56, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The number of tickets is unfortunately not declining as I would like.
> > This is in spite of us actually closing some previous tickets.
> >
> > + 32 in progress
> > + 10 new
> >
>
OK to revert. I didn't catch that it was 3 commits to revert cleanly.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 1:28 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> The CAN API is not mature enough for a release. This patch set
> reverts it. See #4803.
>
> I expect to revisit this during the 7 development cycle.
>
> Gedare Bloom (3):
Ok. Are there others like this?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 1:28 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This reverts commit 5b124432e27dd91f66f71464b586cc369e15ec99.
> ---
> spec/build/testsuites/libtests/can01.yml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
Hi
The number of tickets is unfortunately not declining as I would like. This
is in spite of us actually closing some previous tickets.
+ 32 in progress
+ 10 new
I do not know if the milestone for any of these can be changed but we need
to work on this.
Please look through the tickets and see
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 12:52 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 27.07.23 02:13, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:50 AM Sebastian Huber
> > > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 1:13 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 26.07.23 17:17, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:15 PM Sebastian Huber
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25.07.23 23:41, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >>> I have sent two initial patches to begin
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:50 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Replace the main page with a high level description of the RTEMS feature
> set similar to:
>
> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/overview/index.html#features
>
> The replaced content can be
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 5:53 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:48 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > I may have missed something. Commented in one place.
> >
> > It looks like mostly spaces inside () and variable/parameter declaration
> changes.
>
I may have missed something. Commented in one place.
It looks like mostly spaces inside () and variable/parameter declaration
changes.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:38 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/score/cpu/arm/__aeabi_read_tp.c| 2 +-
> cpukit/score/cpu/arm/__tls_get_addr.c
Updates #4928.
---
common/waf.py | 17 ++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/waf.py b/common/waf.py
index 0bd166a..6efe038 100644
--- a/common/waf.py
+++ b/common/waf.py
@@ -16,7 +16,11 @@ from waflib.Build import BuildContext
import latex
Unfortunately, updating past Sphinx 5.x results in unordered bullet
lists not formatting correctly as show in a screen capture attached
to #4928. Revert this patch until the issue is resolved and output
is reviewed for other potential issues.
From: Utkarsh Verma
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023
commit?
--joel
Joel Sherrill (2):
layout.html: Revert patch forcing Spinx to >= 6.0
common/waf.py: Add option to check maximum Sphinx version
common/sphinx_rtd_theme_rtems/layout.html | 2 --
common/waf.py | 17 ++---
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:15 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 25.07.23 19:09, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:12 AM Sebastian Huber
> > > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
> &
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:19 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 25.07.23 19:15, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:11 AM Sebastian Huber
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 25.07.23 18:01, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 5:13 AM
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:12 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Allow the user to set the version control key.
> ---
> spec/build/cpukit/grp.yml | 2 ++
> spec/build/cpukit/optversionvckey.yml | 20 ++
> wscript
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 9:08 AM Christian MAUDERER <
christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Joel,
>
> On 2023-07-25 15:46, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 5:02 AM Christian MAUDERER
> > > <mailto:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 8:55 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 25.07.23 15:52, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Is something similar going to be needed for architecture and BSP
> > specific IDLE threads?
>
> You have to run gcov to figure
Is something similar going to be needed for architecture and BSP specific
IDLE threads?
--joel
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 1:09 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> OK
>
> Chris
>
> On 25/7/2023 4:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108658
> >
> > This GCC bug leads
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 5:02 AM Christian MAUDERER <
christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noted that some BSPs are missing in the config files in the
> rtems-tools repo. If I didn't miss one it's:
>
> - aarch64, raspberrypi4b
> - aarch64,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:49 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 24.07.23 17:34, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > What about the other io methods in score like for gcov and hashing?
> > Is there a better location for those?
>
> We cou
No comments on this. Thanks and push it.
I think you sent this the day we lost power for 8 hours. :(
What about the other io methods in score like for gcov and hashing?
Is there a better location for those?
--joel
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:13 AM Sebastian Huber <
I'm not that familiar with this logic but your change looks right to me.
Please.change the title from type to typo. It looks like a typo in your
commitmto fix a typo. Lol
I'm ok with you pushing this.
--joel
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023, 10:04 AM Karel Gardas wrote:
> Fixes #4930.
> ---
>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:30 PM Alan Cudmore
wrote:
> Hi Mazaya,
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 8:35 PM Muhammad Sulthan Mazaya <
> msulthanmaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> > Also, as you mentioned, the renode Zephyr example runs directly from
>> RAM without a prom image. Is it that
Hi
Starting another thread so we can focus on this without all the code in the
way.
Chris' concern was that deleting the regulator includes deleting the
delivery thread and that could cause the delivery function to leave
resources like mutexes in an unknown state. He asked about a coordinated
Good catch. Thanks.
Committed.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 3:25 PM Zainab Olalekan
wrote:
> From: Zainab Olalekan
>
> changed bsp to arch/bsp
> ---
> user/start/bsp-build.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/user/start/bsp-build.rst
Hi
I ran into an issue with the output from rtems-docs. I tracked it down to a
commit which moved up the minimum version of Sphinx required but didn't
change the waf check. I will get to fixing that. In the mean time, I built
a new VM for documentation but the README isn't much help on some of
e. It had shadowed global variables and parameters.
And we should get a Coverity email which says it is fixed. :)
--joel
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 9:38 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> > The recent grlib changes introduced a Coverity issues.
> >
> > -- Fo
The recent grlib changes introduced a Coverity issues.
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 12:22 AM
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS
To:
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to RTEMS found
with Coverity
file mode 100644
index 0000000..4a4f8de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/misc/regulator/wscript
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# Copyright 2023 Joel Sherrill (j...@rtems.org)
+#
+# This file's license is 2-clause BSD as in this distribution's LICENSE.2 file.
+#
+
+# Waf build script for an RTEMS Hello
+import rtems_waf.rtems as
Updates #4924.
The Regulator is an application support class which is used to
deal with the scenario where there is a bursty input source
which needs to be metered out to a destination sink. The maximum
size of bursts needs to be known and the delivery method must
be configured to deliver
to the Sink via
DMA. In this case, the buffer would be released as
part of processing DMA transfer complete.
Joel Sherrill (1):
Add the Regulator Interface and test
cpukit/include/rtems/regulator.h | 439 ++
cpukit/include/rtems/regulatorimpl.h | 103 ++
cpukit/libmisc
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 2:09 AM Christian MAUDERER <
christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Jacob,
>
> On 2023-07-14 08:36, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> > Hello Jacob,
> >
> > On 2023-07-13 18:59, Jacob Killelea wrote:
> >> Hi Christian,
> >>
> >> This looks awesome! Do you have any
If someone doesn't pipe up with complaints or questions in the next few
days, go ahead andcommit this.
--joel
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 3:55 AM Karel Gardas
wrote:
> On 7/14/23 01:24, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4:11 PM Karel Gardas
> > wrote:
> >
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4:11 PM Karel Gardas
wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> please take this patch as an attempt to renew old discussion or rather
> start a new one focused solely on importing new ARM CMSIS code which is
> (i) under Apache 2 license but (ii) without any NOTICE file.
>
The absence of a
Pavel this was filed as https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4903. The ticket
submitter
didn't give a patch, just a code change snippet and explanation. Zack
turned it into
a patch. You will need to post that on the ticket to get the submitter's
feedback.
I hope you don't mind copying that to the
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 1:01 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This probably requires some documentation, as it requires several
> packages that are not going to be typically installed already by RTEMS
> users/developers. Chris, is there any place to document required
> dependencies/packages for a build
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 12:50 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 7:05 AM Christian MAUDERER
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Utkarsh,
> >
> > please be a bit careful with GPIO and pin functions. That's a quite
> > difficult topic.
> >
> > Some controller manufacturers mix these functions.
First, the patch commit message needs to reference the ticket (#4903).
It would be nice to have Pavel's feedback but the submitter of
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4903
provided the fix but not in patch format. What do you think we should do
beyond trust the
submitter of the ticket?
Thanks. With a bit of help from Kinsey, the regulator example is
conditionally built-in rtems-examples only if the regulator.h header file
is installed.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 6:15 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 6/7/2023 8:24 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > I have a case for an addition
AXIMUM_PARTITIONS 1
+#define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PERIODS 1
+
+#define CONFIGURE_UNIFIED_WORK_AREAS
+#define CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_TASK_STACK_SIZE (8 * 1024)
+
+#define CONFIGURE_INIT
+#include
diff --git a/misc/regulator/wscript b/misc/regulator/wscript
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4a4f8de
--- /dev/nu
Updates #4924.
The Regulator is an application support class which is used to
deal with the scenario where there is a bursty input source
which needs to be metered out to a destination sink. The maximum
size of bursts needs to be known and the delivery method must
be configured to deliver
Hi
Building the rtems-examples, the test fat_ramdisk gets a failure from
rtems-tld because _Thread_Close is still listed in the ini files it uses.
What symbols should be in the sections that currently have _Thread_Close?
Small patch below my signature which just removes _Thread_Close
101 - 200 of 5859 matches
Mail list logo
