rm that assumes a short distance to the destination but
is going
to a symbol outside start.S and thus could be further.
--joel
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:43 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> >
> > On 18/10/2022 1:13 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 9:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 9:32 AM Alan Cudmore wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 9:19 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > Pushed. Thanks for pinging. It does help.
> >
> > Since you are looking at the riscv BSPs, could you look at the four
> > BSP build fail
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, 2:19 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Padmarao,
>
> I am not sure if rtems-libbsd was used on riscv before, however, adding
> the architecture support wouldn't be difficult.
>
I agree with Sebastian that I don't think riscv has been use
Updates #3420.
---
cpukit/include/adainclude/rtems-io.adb | 21 -
testsuites/sptests/sp21/sp21.scn | 3 ---
2 files changed, 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/include/adainclude/rtems-io.adb
b/cpukit/include/adainclude/rtems-io.adb
index 41a315c..addc2e2 100644
--- a
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:53 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 14.10.22 15:45, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > While teaching an RTEMS class this week, I noticed that rtems_build_name
> > is in the Classic API Guide index twice. Once with
Hi
While teaching an RTEMS class this week, I noticed that rtems_build_name is
in the Classic API Guide index twice. Once with () and once without. I
started to fix that one case when I noticed that it appears we are just
very inconsistent.
(rtemsdocs) [joel@localhost c-user]$ grep -r index:: |
Pushed. Thanks for pinging. It does help.
Since you are looking at the riscv BSPs, could you look at the four
BSP build failures reported here:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2022-September/036496.html
I think they are all variants so one fix (maybe repeated) should do it.
The reported
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 5:32 PM Ryan Long wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2022 7:43 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 12/10/2022 3:24 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
> >> Consider a patch to add the piece removed at the end of this patch as
> approved.
> > I see the patch was pushed, thanks. The RSB hash will need to be
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:18 AM wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2022-10-13 at 06:27 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > know the content is safe
> >
> > On 12/10/2022 16:36, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
Hi
I was looking at the bsp default settings for sparc/leon3 to show someone
and noticed this which is out of place.
# boot hartid (processor number) of risc-v cpu (default 0)
RISCV_BOOT_HARTID = 0
I looked around and see it is an architecture specific ini setting but
placed in a directory with
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:36 PM Ryan Long wrote:
> Cygwin has been unable to build the tools for awhile. This has been due
> to an array subscript being a char while building DTC. The maintainers
> didn't see an issue with the code itself, so it's going to go on being
> broken for awhile I guess.
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Mon, Oct 10, 2022, 12:22 AM
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS
To:
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to RTEMS found
with Coverity Scan.
1 new defect(s) introduced to RTEMS found with Coverity
On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 7:24 AM Noor Aman wrote:
> Hey Frank,
>
> I was able to find the issue which was causing the pdf to be not built
> properly.
> ==
> diff --git a/filesystem/trivial_ftp.rst b/filesystem/trivial_ftp.rst
> index 3ef8bba..eccd035 100644
> --- a/filesystem/trivial_ftp.rst
>
I pushed it but could only build html. See the other thread for issues
building PDF.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 8:38 AM Kinsey Moore
wrote:
> Looks good to me. Thanks for sticking with this!
>
>
> Kinsey
>
> On 10/7/2022 00:00, Mohd Noor Aman wrote:
> > This patch adds the relevant documentations re
Hi
I have renamed the rtems-lwip main to master to be consistent with the
other repositories.
Once we reach consensus about the new name for master across all repos, are
willing to update documentation, and have it scheduled, we can rename
master across all RTEMS repos at the same time.
Hopefull
Hi
I have been building the docs fairly regularly as part of pushing
patches but it is not building PDF on the master for me.
===
[62/62] Compiling build/filesystem/latex/filesystem.tex
first pass on pdflatex
11:48:31 runner ['/usr/local/texlive/2019/bin/x86_64-linux/p
I think the ticket was targeting 5 as the milestone. You should push this
to 5 also if it applies.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2022, 12:15 AM Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Module:rtems
> Branch:master
> Commit:46f08961a22ff7ffc6196971c0ff04006689ded1
> Changeset:
> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?i
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 4:24 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 30/9/22 4:00 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > I'd like to propose that short term we change lwip main to master for
> > consistency with existing repos. This helps avoid stupid mistakes
> because lwip
> > is the o
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 5:03 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 4:38 PM Alan Cudmore
> wrote:
>
>> It builds without error and boots for me!
>> I ran my RTEMS Kernel Image and tried out some task demos, whetstone,
>> dhrystone, created a RAM
EMS Shell on /dev/console. Use 'help' to list commands.
> shell0 [/] #
>
Wow! I'm always impressed by how many RTEMS capabilities are
available in a basic BSP.
All it needs now is a network driver. :)
I'll merge this .
--joel
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 2:4
Once Alan says it's OK, I will merge this.
Great work! Please make sure code, docs, tester configuration, etc gets
merged.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 1:18 PM Kinsey Moore
wrote:
> I think all of the issues with this patch have been addressed; this looks
> good to me.
>
> Great work, Noor!
>
> Kinse
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:40 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 30/09/2022 23:39, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 30/9/2022 7:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> Update #4524.
> >> ---
> >> cpukit/doxygen/appl-config.h| 13 +
> >> cpukit/include/rt
Thanks for the ping. Sorry I was out of town and didn't get to it until
today.
Verify this was merged correctly and this was it.
Thanks.
--joel
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 8:21 AM Frank Kuehndel <
frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> From: Frank Kühndel
>
> ---
> filesystem/index.rst
Hi
I've been bitten twice no because lwip uses main instead of master.
Although I am not offended by having the trunk be named master, I
understand others do care.
I'd like to propose that short term we change lwip main to master for
consistency with existing repos. This helps avoid stupid mistak
Jeff Johnson pushed the patch to newlib. The github mirrored it after a
while. I bumped the hash in the RSB.
This should be ok now.
How often does the github mirroring of gcc, newlib, etc run?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 3:53 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I'm not sure what triggers the newli
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
index fe4f827..c8eb0a6 100644
--- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
index fe4f827..76dc221 100644
--- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib
I'm not sure what triggers the newlib mirror to update on github. When it's
up to date, I'm ready to update rteems-source-builder.
Sebastian.. what's the trigger?
--joel
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 1:08 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, 1:51 PM Seb
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022, 7:43 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this. It is exciting to see this board being supported. Well
> done
> getting to a point we can review the changess. My comments are mostly
> about the
> commit message :)
>
> Is the BSP called `aarch64/raspberrypi4b`? I just w
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, 1:51 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 26/09/2022 18:58, Markus Moessner wrote:
> >>> The second one is triggered by the function getrusage in
> rtemsbsd/include/bsd/sys/ressource.h.
> >>> There is a another declaration in include/sys/ressou
I expect you noticed but there were a lot of tool build failures over the
past few days reported.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, 2:05 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 26/9/2022 4:45 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 26/09/2022 08:43, Chris Johns wrote:
> >> On 26/9/2022 4:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>> On
Hi
Now that the versal ilp32 BSP variants have been removed, the BSP builder
sweep reports these oddities:
Failures Report
===
1 smp riscv/rv32iac build:
configure: /home/tester/rtems-cron-6/rtems/waf configure\
--prefix=/home/tester/rtems-cron-6/tools/6/bsps --top=/hom
Hi
Tomorrow is the day DART slams into the asteroid. Be sure to catch the NASA
live feed. This is an RTEMS mission of great importance. It could be the
beginning of a planetary defense system.
Tune in for our live broadcast coverage of DART’s impact with Dimorphos
starting Monday, Sept. 26 at 6 p
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:49 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 23/09/2022 18:47, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > On 9/23/22 18:35, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have a question for the waf experts. How can I use the GCC
> >> -frandom-seed= option with t
Thanks Sebastian! That was way easier than I anticipated.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022, 1:40 AM RTEMS trac wrote:
> #4722: Odd IDLE thread ID printing from various BSPs in minimum.exe
> +-
> Reporter: Mohd Noor Aman | Owner: joel@…
> Type:
OK I think.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:58 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Fix documentation.
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/score/chain.h | 22 ++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/cha
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 4:44 AM Karel Gardas
wrote:
> On 9/22/22 10:41, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 22/09/2022 10:30, Karel Gardas wrote:
> >> On 9/22/22 00:00, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:12 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>>>
&
his still trying to catch up
> with all the development in RTEMS over summer...
>
Understood. Work is busy. RTEMS is busy. And with things getting back
to normal, I've even been busy going to concerts and other outings that
I missed. :)
--joel
>
> Karel
>
>
>
> On 9/21
This patch set has been sitting for almost 7 weeks. I was going to commit
it today but was asked to give one last the patch merge equivalent of
""if anyone can show just cause why this patch and RTEMS cannot be
joined together, let them speak now or forever hold their peace"
Or at least be nice
Chris did you add it to the bsp-builder configuration?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022, 11:51 PM wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> > On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 12:03 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > know the content is safe
>
*Subject:* RE: libbsd fails to link on i386
>
>
>
> Hi Joel,
>
>
>
> I remember I spent some time fiddling with the bus.h include order.
>
> I can try to have a look at it some time next week.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Jan
>
>
>
&
I have pushed this patch set. Please check that the merge is OK and follow
up with an update to the Users Guide for those looking for this BSP.
Thanks.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:56 AM Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> This procedure should be added to the Users Guide under the BSPs section.
>
>
This procedure should be added to the Users Guide under the BSPs section.
Otherwise, it looks like I should coordinate with Padmarao to make sure
it's ok after I merged it
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022, 1:50 AM wrote:
> RTEMS SMP on the Microchip PolarFire Icicle Kit
>
> Test Procedure:
>
> 1. Create th
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022, 1:23 PM Alan Cudmore wrote:
> I built the TF-A binary, your dev branch, used the config.txt described
> below, and was able to run unlimited.exe. (I’m using a Pi4b 2GB)
>
> Great milestone!
>
This is great news! Now to get it merged for others.
Are any other peripherals fr
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:11 AM Noor Aman wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I've managed to get RTEMS6 on the Raspberry pi 4B rev 1.4. Every test ran
> fine except for minimum.exe, It gave a fatal error.
>
Congratulations! Hoozah!
minimum.exe is supposed to reflect the smallest application you can have
Hi
This is the first in-person FSW since before COVID. This is a workshop
focused on space going applications. The presentations tend to be very
interesting and top notch. Plus the opportunity to speak with others in the
field is really incredible.
OAR is planning to be there including myself and
I'm ok with this.
FYI Coverity Scans are limited to three times a day but a check for changes
runs more frequently to trigger them.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 1:13 PM Frank Kuehndel <
frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> From: Frank Kühndel
>
> CID 1506523: Unchecked return value from library
Push it Chris.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 10:01 AM Frank Kühndel <
frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I checked your two patches in an opensuse leap 15.4 container building
> the tools (rtems-source-builder git) for RTEMS 6 and ARM BSP. The build
> was OK; the dependencies on "e
None other than nostalgia. Lol
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 3:18 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 08.09.22 10:52, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > Directly use "static inline" which is available in C99 and later. This
> brings
> > the RTEMS implementation closer to standar
OK. Hopefully this fixes the MIPS issues.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 2:02 AM wrote:
> From: Chris Johns
>
> Closes #2300
> ---
> bare/config/devel/gnu-default-tools.bset| 6 ++
> rtems/config/tools/rtems-default-tools.bset | 5 +
> source-builder/config/gcc-common-1.cfg | 4
Unfortunately needed on some hosts. OK by me.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 2:02 AM wrote:
> From: Chris Johns
>
> Updates #2300
> ---
> bare/config/textproc/gsed-4.8.cfg | 12 +++
> bare/config/textproc/gsed-internal.bset | 12 +++
> bare/config/textproc/gsed.bset | 4 +
> bare/c
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022, 6:27 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 14/9/2022 7:40 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > This appears to be broken yet again. I am using qemu 5.1.91 built with
> the RSB
> > back in July. Does this work for anyone?
> >
> > Advice or (even better) a fi
Hi
This appears to be broken yet again. I am using qemu 5.1.91 built with the
RSB back in July. Does this work for anyone?
Advice or (even better) a fix appreciated.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/
evel/2022-July/072167.html).
>
> Best regards,
> Kuan-Hsun
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:35 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> What is this a remedy for?
>>
>> Why isn't the helper method OK to use?
>>
>> --joel
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at
What is this a remedy for?
Why isn't the helper method OK to use?
--joel
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:41 AM Strange369
wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/score/coremuteximpl.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/coremuteximpl.h
> b
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 10:40 PM Kinsey Moore wrote:
> I think this may also be waiting on the RTEMS patches to go in based on
> the prerequisite comment.
>
Ok. Monday we can work this out.
On 9/9/2022 22:00, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> I'd like to see another ack. Chris? And
I'd like to see another ack. Chris? Andrei? Christian? Poke them on discord
please.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 9:05 PM Kinsey Moore wrote:
> This addresses all my issues with the patch, looks good!
>
>
> Kinsey
>
> On 9/9/2022 18:13, Duc Doan wrote:
> > This patch set aims to port RTEMS lwIP for STM32
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg
index d7522fd..14ee346 100644
--- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg
+++ b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tool
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:26 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 08/09/2022 16:21, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Were there no updates to md4/md5 code in libmd? git blame shows md4.c as
> > having mostly no updates in 15 years.
>
> Th
OK. Minimum is supposed to be just that. If something is in it which can be
trimmed out, it is up for discussion.
This looks good to me.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:15 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> The CONFIGURE_UNIFIED_WORK_AREAS option pulls in a system initial
Were there no updates to md4/md5 code in libmd? git blame shows md4.c as
having mostly no updates in 15 years.
--joel
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:27 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Alan Somers (1):
> Fix C++ includability of crypto headers with static array sizes
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:40 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 8/9/2022 5:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 08/09/2022 08:56, Chris Johns wrote:
> >> Is the score going to be run through clang-format?
> >
> > I gave up finding the proper clang-format configuration which is close
> > to the RTEMS style
Ok. Just push it then.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, 8:05 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 08/09/2022 15:03, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Ok. Did it get removed from anywhere?
>
> No, the header files are generated by a script and I improved the
Ok. Did it get removed from anywhere?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, 1:11 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Directly include in header files using CPU build
> options.
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/config.h | 1 +
> cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/intr.h | 1 +
> cpukit/in
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 8:27 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 8/9/2022 9:50 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 4:47 PM Chris Johns > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/9/2022 12:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > Hi
> >
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 4:47 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 8/9/2022 12:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Do these references to the ilp32 need to be removed?
> >
> > rtems-tools]$ grep -r ilp32 | grep versal
> > config/rtems-bsps-aarc
---
config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini | 12
config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini
index 110ab17..7992327 100644
--- a/config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini
+++ b/confi
Hi
Do these references to the ilp32 need to be removed?
rtems-tools]$ grep -r ilp32 | grep versal
config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini: xilinx_versal_ilp32_qemu,
xilinx_versal_ilp32_vck190,
config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini:xilinx_versal_ilp32_qemu,
xilinx_versal_lp64_qemu,
config/rtems-bsps-tiers.i
This looks good.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022, 7:19 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Issue an error message if a SMP-specific scheduler is used and RTEMS_SMP
> is disabled. This might be a more informative compared to compiler or
> linker errors.
> ---
> cpukit/include/r
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022, 2:04 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Joel,
>
> On 02/09/2022 18:25, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Updates #4691.
> > ---
> > config.yml | 2 ++
> > spec/acf
Updates #4713.
---
posix-users/process_creation_and_execution.rst | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/posix-users/process_creation_and_execution.rst
b/posix-users/process_creation_and_execution.rst
index 835f3cc..8570b25 100644
--- a/posix-users/process_
Closes #4713.
---
cpukit/posix/src/pthreadatfork.c| 13 +
testsuites/psxtests/psxenosys/init.c| 10 --
testsuites/psxtests/psxenosys/psxenosys.scn | 2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/posix/src/pthreadatfork.c b/cp
Closes #4691.
---
c-user/config/face-technical-standard.rst | 77 +++
c-user/config/index.rst | 1 +
2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 c-user/config/face-technical-standard.rst
diff --git a/c-user/config/face-technical-standard.rs
Updates #4691.
---
config.yml | 2 ++
spec/acfg/if/group-face.yml| 30 ++
spec/acfg/if/posix-timer-face-behavior.yml | 23 +++
3 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 spec/acfg/if/group-f
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 2:59 AM Daniel Cederman
wrote:
> On 2022-08-30 21:10, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> I think it's OK to push after this long.
>
> Also be sure to add some to the RTEMS Users Guide for this BSP.
>
> Will do.
>
>
> Does this work on any simula
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:00 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Joel,
>
> On 30/08/2022 22:44, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > When I am on master of rtems-central.git and sub spec2modules.py, it
> > generates updates to rtems-docs and rtem
Hi
When I am on master of rtems-central.git and sub spec2modules.py, it
generates updates to rtems-docs and rtems. My understanding is that if they
were in sync, there would be no changes in rtems-docs and rtems.
(env) [joel@localhost rtems-central]$ ./spec2modules.py
(env) [joel@localhost rtems-
And then Sebastian replies while I was typing that.
Address his concerns. :)
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 2:10 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I think it's OK to push after this long.
>
> Also be sure to add some to the RTEMS Users Guide for this BSP.
>
> Does this work on any s
I think it's OK to push after this long.
Also be sure to add some to the RTEMS Users Guide for this BSP.
Does this work on any simulator?
--joel
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 6:39 AM Daniel Cederman
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it OK to push this or should I wait for additional comments?
>
> On 2022-08-25 1
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 8:12 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 22/08/2022 01:30, Chris Johns wrote:
> > - keyimpl.h is not referenced and so not needed
>
> We install all the *impl.h header files. Why should keyimpl.h be an
> exception?
>
I'd lean to installing
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 9:53 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 30/08/2022 16:37, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 8:44 AM Sebastian Huber
> > > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 9:40 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 30/08/2022 16:38, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Ignore these warnings:
> > + *
> > + * - invalid use of str
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 1:10 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Use RTEMS_ZERO_LENGTH_ARRAY for flexible array member.
>
> Update #4662.
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h | 10 ++
> cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulerpriority.h | 2 +-
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 8:44 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 30/08/2022 15:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:05 AM Sebastian Huber
> > > <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wr
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:05 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 30/08/2022 00:56, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote:
> > ** CID 1512552: High impact quality (Y2K38_SAFETY)
> > /cpukit/score/src/kern_tc.c: 1804 in _Timecounter_Windup()
> >
> >
> >
>
Another report from the new version. :(
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Mon, Aug 29, 2022, 5:55 PM
Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS
To:
Your request for analysis of RTEMS has been completed successfully.
The results are available at
https://u1581
Again.. issue lurking spotted by new version of Coverity Scan.
Please look at it and fix.
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 5:55 PM
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS
To:
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduce
I don't think this is due to a recent addition. I just upgraded to a new
version of the Coverity analysis tool.
Does anyone see a fix for this?
--joel
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 5:14 PM
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS-Tools
To
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 2:41 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 29/08/2022 09:30, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 29/8/22 5:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> On 19/08/2022 22:46, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>> Module:rtems
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022, 2:35 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 17/08/2022 23:01, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Sorry. Forgot to update my libbsd tree and got the wrong error. It is
> this:
> >
> >
> /home/joel/rtems-work/tool
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022, 8:14 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 27/8/2022 12:13 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2022-August/035493.html
> > <https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2022-August/035493.html> --
> m68k on
&g
I'm ok with these but which were actually causing trouble?
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022, 8:12 PM wrote:
> From: Chris Johns
>
> Closes #4709
> ---
> cpukit/include/link_elf.h | 8
> cpukit/include/linux/rbtree.h | 10 +-
> cpukit/include/rtems/capt
Hi
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2022-August/035493.html -- m68k on
Cygwin fails with this weird error.
rm gcc.pod
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/rtems-tester/rtems-cron-5/rtems-source-builder/rtems/build/m68k-rtems5-gcc-7.5.0-newlib-7947581-x86_64-pc-cygwin-1/buil
Looks ok. Push it.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 1:54 AM wrote:
> From: Chris Johns
>
> - Versal has IO mapped to the upper 64bit address space and
> needs full 64bit addresses.
>
> - Add xilinx_versal_aiedge for custom hardware
>
> - Make the hardware settings the defaults and qemu as variants
>
>
t; top.exe
>> fileio.exe
>> capture.exe
>> Benchmark:
>> dhrystone.exe
>> linpack.exe
>> whetstone.exe
>> Timeouts:
>> ts-fatal-start-on-not-online-processor.exe
>> ts-validation-0.exe
>> ts-validation-no-clock-0.exe
>&g
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022, 3:00 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 20 Aug 2022, at 3:39 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Stephen tripped across this and I'm reporting it because it is going to
> > take some discussion to resolve.
> >
> > Ste
Hi
Stephen tripped across this and I'm reporting it because it is going to
take some discussion to resolve.
Stephen is using the .pc files to create a configuration file
for the FACE Conformance Test Suite. This is now basically working
for multiple BSPs. The amd64 includes -Werror in its BSP com
Hi
I just posted my patch to rtems-central. Unfortunately, when I ran
spec2modules.py, other changes were propagated to rtems and rtems-docs.
Sebastian.. can you verify that all is in sync before my patch?
Thanks.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@r
---
config.yml | 2 ++
spec/acfg/if/group-face.yml| 30 ++
spec/acfg/if/posix-timer-face-behavior.yml | 23 +++
3 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 spec/acfg/if/group-face.yml
create
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
>
> I took a shot at compiling libbsd for x86_64. First issue is that freebsd
> calls this amd64 so the reebsd/sys/@ARCH@/include is looking for the
> wrong architecture name. Somehow the waf needs to map x86_64 to amd64.
401 - 500 of 4884 matches
Mail list logo
