On 25/03/2016 9:25 AM, Hesham Almatary wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 23/03/2016 04:55, Gedare Bloom wrote:
You can check them in. Let Joel/Chris know as they have been release
testing 4.11
Hesham, sorry I have lost track of what is needed. Do clean patches
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I checked them in.
>
Thanks Gedare
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 23/03/2016 04:55, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> You can check them in. Let Joel/Chris know as they have been release
>>> testing 4.11
>>>
>>
>>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 23/03/2016 04:55, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>>
>> You can check them in. Let Joel/Chris know as they have been release
>> testing 4.11
>>
>
> Hesham, sorry I have lost track of what is needed. Do clean patches exist to
> make the required chang
I checked them in.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 23/03/2016 04:55, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>>
>> You can check them in. Let Joel/Chris know as they have been release
>> testing 4.11
>>
>
> Hesham, sorry I have lost track of what is needed. Do clean patches exist to
> ma
On 23/03/2016 04:55, Gedare Bloom wrote:
You can check them in. Let Joel/Chris know as they have been release
testing 4.11
Hesham, sorry I have lost track of what is needed. Do clean patches
exist to make the required changes for 4.11 and master?
Thanks
Chris
__
Hesham,
You can check them in. Let Joel/Chris know as they have been release
testing 4.11
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> Thanks Gedare. Both work fine with or1ksim and qemu.
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> Hi Hesham,
>>
>> I think the 4.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22.03.2016 03:09, Hesham Almatary wrote:
> Thanks Gedare. Both work fine with or1ksim and qemu.
Hi,
I have recently moved GCC forward to the GCC 6 snapshot the other
architectures use. Should or1k also keep up with the most recent GCC
development
Thanks Gedare. Both work fine with or1ksim and qemu.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hi Hesham,
>
> I think the 4.12 patch is there. (updates 2669)
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Hesham Almatary
> wrote:
>> The patch works fine for 4.11 branches on both or1ksim and
Hi Hesham,
I think the 4.12 patch is there. (updates 2669)
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> The patch works fine for 4.11 branches on both or1ksim and qemu. 4.12
> patch will be really appreciated.
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Hesham Almatary
> wrote:
>> On Mon,
The patch works fine for 4.11 branches on both or1ksim and qemu. 4.12
patch will be really appreciated.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Stefan Wallentowitz
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 20.03.2016
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Stefan Wallentowitz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 20.03.2016 22:17, Hesham Almatary wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> Thanks you! The gcc-4.8 patch was aging, so updating it is great.
>>
>> Have you had a chance to build the or1k BSP and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20.03.2016 22:17, Hesham Almatary wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Thanks you! The gcc-4.8 patch was aging, so updating it is great.
>
> Have you had a chance to build the or1k BSP and run ticker or hello
> on or1ksim with those new patches?
>
> Cheers, H
Hi Stefan,
Thanks you! The gcc-4.8 patch was aging, so updating it is great.
Have you had a chance to build the or1k BSP and run ticker or hello on
or1ksim with those new patches?
Cheers,
Hesham
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Stefan Wallentowitz
wrote:
> Bump the OpenRISC toolchain to newer
Bump the OpenRISC toolchain to newer versions.
* Binutils to 2.26
* GCC to 4.9.3
* GDB to 7.9
updates #2668
---
rtems/config/4.11/rtems-or1k.bset | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/4.11/rtems-or1k.bset
b/rtems/config/4.11/rtems-or1k.b
14 matches
Mail list logo