Re: [PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/7/21 8:55 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 5:49 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 22/7/21 8:35 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:10 PM Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 5:49 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 22/7/21 8:35 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:10 PM Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > >> > >> On 21/07/2021 21:05, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > The problem is that one BSP which supports SMP "riscv/griscv" is > identical to >

Re: [PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/7/21 8:35 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:10 PM Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 21/07/2021 21:05, Gedare Bloom wrote: > The problem is that one BSP which supports SMP "riscv/griscv" is > identical to > the family "riscv/griscv" which contains BSPs which

Re: [PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:10 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 21/07/2021 21:05, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >>> The problem is that one BSP which supports SMP "riscv/griscv" is > >>> identical to > >>> the family "riscv/griscv" which contains BSPs which do not support SMP > >>> ("riscv/grv32i" and

Re: [PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-21 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 21/07/2021 21:05, Gedare Bloom wrote: The problem is that one BSP which supports SMP "riscv/griscv" is identical to the family "riscv/griscv" which contains BSPs which do not support SMP ("riscv/grv32i" and riscv/grv32im"). Hmm, tricky. Can the BSPs that do not support SMP disable SMP in the

Re: [PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-21 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > > > On 20/7/21 8:25 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 15/07/2021 08:19, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> This makes it possible to use the BSP family in expressions of the > >> enabled-by > >> attribute. > >> --- > >> wscript | 7 ++- > >>

Re: [PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-20 Thread Chris Johns
On 20/7/21 8:25 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/07/2021 08:19, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> This makes it possible to use the BSP family in expressions of the enabled-by >> attribute. >> --- >>   wscript | 7 ++- >>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/wscript

Re: [PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-20 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 15/07/2021 08:19, Sebastian Huber wrote: This makes it possible to use the BSP family in expressions of the enabled-by attribute. --- wscript | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/wscript b/wscript index 487951fdba..1331ae149e 100755 --- a/wscript +++

Re: [PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-15 Thread Chris Johns
That is a nice change. OK to push Chris On 15/7/21 4:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > This makes it possible to use the BSP family in expressions of the enabled-by > attribute. > --- > wscript | 7 ++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/wscript b/wscript >

[PATCH] build: Add the BSP family to the enable set

2021-07-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
This makes it possible to use the BSP family in expressions of the enabled-by attribute. --- wscript | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/wscript b/wscript index 487951fdba..1331ae149e 100755 --- a/wscript +++ b/wscript @@ -1387,7 +1387,12 @@ def