Hello Chris,
Am 07.12.21 um 05:10 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 3/12/21 11:50 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
RTEMS untar implementation had problems with overwriting or integrating
archives into existing directory structures. This patch adapts the
behavior to mimic that of a GNU tar or BSD tar and
On 3/12/21 11:50 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
> RTEMS untar implementation had problems with overwriting or integrating
> archives into existing directory structures. This patch adapts the
> behavior to mimic that of a GNU tar or BSD tar and extends the tar01
> test to check for the behavior.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:11 AM Christian MAUDERER
wrote:
>
> Hello Joel,
>
> thanks for the review. I'll apply it on master in the next few days.
>
> The behavior that our untar can't overwrite directories is in 5 too. The
> behavior on 5 changed last with the patches from ticket #3823 in
>
Hello Joel,
thanks for the review. I'll apply it on master in the next few days.
The behavior that our untar can't overwrite directories is in 5 too. The
behavior on 5 changed last with the patches from ticket #3823 in
2019-11. I would lean to creating a ticket for 5 and apply the patch
I don't see anything that would stop this from being committed.
This does make me realize that I think all of the untar capabilities
are undocumented.
--joel
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 6:51 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> RTEMS untar implementation had problems with overwriting or integrating
>
RTEMS untar implementation had problems with overwriting or integrating
archives into existing directory structures. This patch adapts the
behavior to mimic that of a GNU tar or BSD tar and extends the tar01
test to check for the behavior. That is:
* If a directory structure exists, the files
