On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
From: Josh Oguin josh.og...@oarcorp.com
This was flagged by CodeSonar. It should be impossible to get an
incorrect baud number back but ensure this in debug mode. The _Assert()
keeps their scanner from evaluating
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
On 26/11/2014 10:02 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
From: Josh Oguin josh.og...@oarcorp.com
This was flagged by CodeSonar. It should be impossible to get an
incorrect baud number back but ensure this in debug mode. The _Assert()
On November 26, 2014 9:33:57 AM CST, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
On 26/11/2014 10:02 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
From: Josh Oguin josh.og...@oarcorp.com
This was flagged by CodeSonar. It should be impossible to get
From: Josh Oguin josh.og...@oarcorp.com
This was flagged by CodeSonar. It should be impossible to get an
incorrect baud number back but ensure this in debug mode. The _Assert()
keeps their scanner from evaluating for divide by 0 past this point.
---
c/src/libchip/serial/ns16550-context.c | 4
