Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

On 15/06/2020 14:33, Richi Dubey wrote: Hi, rtems_to_spec and ./spec2doc, both are giving similar error: $ ./spec2doc.py Traceback (most recent call last):   File "./spec2doc.py", line 41, in     main()   File "./spec2doc.py", line 37, in main    

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

Hi, rtems_to_spec and ./spec2doc, both are giving similar error: $ ./spec2doc.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "./spec2doc.py", line 41, in main() File "./spec2doc.py", line 37, in main rtemsqual.glossary.generate(config["glossary"], item_cache) File

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

On 15/06/2020 13:32, Richi Dubey wrote: Thanks for your quick response. I am getting the following error: richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ git pull Already up to date. richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ ./spec2doc.py   File "./spec2doc.py", line 31     def main() -> None:                ^

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

Hi, Thanks for your quick response. I am getting the following error: richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ git pull Already up to date. richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ ./spec2doc.py File "./spec2doc.py", line 31 def main() -> None: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Is it because

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

On 10/06/2020 16:41, Richi Dubey wrote: Hi, Please mark the following required changes: 1) Add: cd rtems-qual/ After git clone and before git submodule init. 2) I am getting the following error on running git submodule update: richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ git submodule update Cloning

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

Hi, Please mark the following required changes: 1) Add: cd rtems-qual/ After git clone and before git submodule init. 2) I am getting the following error on running git submodule update: richi@YouAreAmazing:~/rtems-qual$ git submodule update Cloning into

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

On 07/06/2020 15:36, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/06/2020 15:09, Richi Dubey wrote: Hii, Thanks for your review. The glossary is generated from specification items: https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems-qual.git/tree/spec/glos/term I will work on a documentation how this works in the next

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

On 06/06/2020 15:09, Richi Dubey wrote: Hii, Thanks for your review. The glossary is generated from specification items: https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems-qual.git/tree/spec/glos/term I will work on a documentation how this works in the next days. Have you already submitted one? If yes,

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

Hii, Thanks for your review. > The glossary is generated from specification items: > > https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems-qual.git/tree/spec/glos/term > > I will work on a documentation how this works in the next days. Have you already submitted one? If yes, could you please send me the link to

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

On 02/06/2020 15:52, Richi Dubey wrote: --- user/glossary/index.rst | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/user/glossary/index.rst b/user/glossary/index.rst index 5648b39..2ae0fdf 100644 --- a/user/glossary/index.rst +++ b/user/glossary/index.rst @@ -16,6 +16,21

[PATCH 2/2] Adding strong and weak definitions

--- user/glossary/index.rst | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/user/glossary/index.rst b/user/glossary/index.rst index 5648b39..2ae0fdf 100644 --- a/user/glossary/index.rst +++ b/user/glossary/index.rst @@ -16,6 +16,21 @@ Glossary APA Arbitrary