Zhao; devel@rtems.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Port openssl to RTEMS.
Should we consider an 'OPENSSL.README' file in the top of libbsd to make sure we
are covered?
Something like:
8<---
The RTEMS LibBSD package contains OpenSSL. Please refer to
https://www.openssl.org/ for
On 10/08/2017 15:56, Christian Mauderer wrote:
> Am 10.08.2017 um 07:46 schrieb Chris Johns:
>> On 10/08/2017 15:42, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>>> The version here is likely to become out of sync with the sources. To be
>>> exact: It already is in your suggestion.
>>>
Am 10.08.2017 um 07:46 schrieb Chris Johns:
> On 10/08/2017 15:42, Christian Mauderer wrote:
>> The version here is likely to become out of sync with the sources. To be
>> exact: It already is in your suggestion.
>> freebsd-org/crypto/openssl/README states the version 1.0.2.k. Maybe we
>> should
On 10/08/2017 15:42, Christian Mauderer wrote:
> The version here is likely to become out of sync with the sources. To be
> exact: It already is in your suggestion.
> freebsd-org/crypto/openssl/README states the version 1.0.2.k. Maybe we
> should refer to that file instead?
Sure with a specific
Should we consider an 'OPENSSL.README' file in the top of libbsd to make sure we
are covered?
Something like:
8<---
The RTEMS LibBSD package contains OpenSSL. Please refer to
https://www.openssl.org/ for the legalities related to your use.
OpenSSL
---
OpenSSL 1.0.2l 25
---
builder.py | 58
libbsd.py| 952 +++
libbsd_waf.py| 901 +++-
waf_generator.py | 3 +
4 files changed, 1898 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builder.py