Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 12/5/20 11:22 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:11 AM Chris Johns > wrote: On 12/5/20 5:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > On 09/05/2020 03:30, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Without these tests being tagged this way the

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 13/5/20 12:11 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:11 AM Chris Johns wrote: On 12/5/20 5:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello, On 09/05/2020 03:30, Gedare Bloom wrote: Without these tests being tagged this way the user would have no idea where the stand after a build and

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:11 AM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 12/5/20 5:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 09/05/2020 03:30, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Without these tests being tagged this way the user would have no > > idea where the stand after a build and test run and that

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:11 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 12/5/20 5:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 09/05/2020 03:30, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Without these tests being tagged this way the user would have no > > idea where the stand after a build and test run and that

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 12/5/20 5:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello, On 09/05/2020 03:30, Gedare Bloom wrote: Without these tests being tagged this way the user would have no idea where the stand after a build and test run and that would mean we would have to make sure a release has no failures. I consider

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

Hello, On 09/05/2020 03:30, Gedare Bloom wrote: Without these tests being tagged this way the user would have no idea where the stand after a build and test run and that would mean we would have to make sure a release has no failures. I consider that as not practical or realistic. Maybe we

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 --- bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg diff --git

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 10/5/20 10:37 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: If it is just to move things from unexpected failure to another category oh, I'm okay with it. I just don't want test written off as expected failure when they haven't been investigated. We have a fair number of those. Sure, I can add this. We need

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Sat, May 9, 2020, 6:56 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 10/5/20 9:24 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020, 6:18 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 10/5/20 4:57 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020, 1:02 PM

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 10/5/20 9:24 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Sat, May 9, 2020, 6:18 PM Chris Johns > wrote: On 10/5/20 4:57 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020, 1:02 PM Gedare Bloom mailto:ged...@rtems.org> >

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Sat, May 9, 2020, 6:18 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 10/5/20 4:57 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020, 1:02 PM Gedare Bloom > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 2:09 AM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 10/5/20 4:57 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Sat, May 9, 2020, 1:02 PM Gedare Bloom > wrote: On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 2:09 AM Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 9/5/20 11:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:12 AM

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Sat, May 9, 2020, 1:02 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 2:09 AM Chris Johns wrote: > > > > On 9/5/20 11:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:12 AM Chris Johns wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber < >

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 2:09 AM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 9/5/20 11:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:12 AM Chris Johns wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> > > On

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 9/5/20 11:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:12 AM Chris Johns wrote: On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:27 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:12 AM Chris Johns wrote: >> >> >> > On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber >> > wrote: >> > >> > On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: >> > >> >>> On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:12 AM Chris Johns wrote: > > > > On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > > > > On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: > > > >>> On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: > >>> > From: Chris Johns

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:12 AM Chris Johns wrote: > > > On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > > On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: > > > >>> On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

> On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: >>> From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 ---

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 ---   bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)   create mode

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 ---   bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)   create mode 100644

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 --- bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg diff --git

[PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 --- bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg