> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Johns [mailto:chr...@rtems.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 3:21 AM
> To: Sebastian Huber; Sommer, Jan; devel@rtems.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] bsps/pc386: Fix IPI for non-consecutive APICIDs
>
> On 15/7/20 7:54 pm,
On 15/7/20 7:54 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 08/07/2020 08:55, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote:
>> Could someone please push this patch to the branches 5 and master?
>> Or do I need a ticket for the 5 branch first?
>
> If it is a bug fix, then the official procedure would be to add tickets for
> RTEMS
On 08/07/2020 08:55, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote:
Could someone please push this patch to the branches 5 and master?
Or do I need a ticket for the 5 branch first?
If it is a bug fix, then the official procedure would be to add tickets
for RTEMS 5 and 6. Since we had no working SMP support before I
PATCH v1 1/1] bsps/pc386: Fix IPI for non-consecutive APICIDs
>
> - properly use the cpu <-> apic maps for IPIs
> ---
> bsps/i386/pc386/start/smp-imps.c | 16 ++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bsps/i386/pc386/start/smp
- properly use the cpu <-> apic maps for IPIs
---
bsps/i386/pc386/start/smp-imps.c | 16 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/i386/pc386/start/smp-imps.c b/bsps/i386/pc386/start/smp-imps.c
index 0985b8f08f..763ac0afc7 100644
--- a/bsps/i386/pc386/sta
