> On Apr 13, 2021, at 11:23 , Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> What about "ineligible" as Gedare originally suggested.
>>
> that would be my preference. It is a cleaner terminology fit.
>
>
From reading the mailings this is in contrast to the "eligible scheduler". So
"ineligible" is good. That's
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:22 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 13/04/2021 16:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> > On 13/04/2021 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >> +foreign scheduler
> >> +An foreign scheduler of a :term:`task` is a
> >> :term:`scheduler` which is not
> >>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:23 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 13/04/2021 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> > +foreign scheduler
> > +An foreign scheduler of a :term:`task` is a
> > :term:`scheduler` which is not
> > +an :term:`eligible scheduler`.
> > +
> >
>
On 13/04/2021 16:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/04/2021 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:
+ foreign scheduler
+ An foreign scheduler of a :term:`task` is a
:term:`scheduler` which is not
+ an :term:`eligible scheduler`.
+
Can we come up with an adjective
On 13/04/2021 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:
+ foreign scheduler
+ An foreign scheduler of a :term:`task` is a
:term:`scheduler` which is not
+ an :term:`eligible scheduler`.
+
Can we come up with an adjective other than foreign. The scheduler did not
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:31 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Add glossary terms which characterize the relationship of a scheduler to
> a task.
> ---
>
> v2:
>
> Address review comments. Use "foreign" instead of "alien".
>
> c-user/glossary.rst | 24
Add glossary terms which characterize the relationship of a scheduler to
a task.
---
v2:
Address review comments. Use "foreign" instead of "alien".
c-user/glossary.rst | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/c-user/glossary.rst b/c-user/glossary.rst
index
