[PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2021-07-30 Thread Sebastian Huber
Change license to BSD-2-Clause according to file histories and documentation re-licensing agreement. Place the group into the I/O Manager group. Add all source files to the group. Update #3899. Update #3993. --- v2: * Add constraints. * Reorder the directives. cpukit/include/rtems/bspIo.h

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-13 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 4:31 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 12/10/20 1:16 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 08/10/2020 08:18, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > >> On 07/10/2020 21:12, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:40 AM Sebastian Huber > >>> wrote: > On 07/10/2020 17:26,

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-11 Thread Chris Johns
On 12/10/20 1:16 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/10/2020 08:18, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> On 07/10/2020 21:12, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:40 AM Sebastian Huber >>> wrote: On 07/10/2020 17:26, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Thinking about the discussion about

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-11 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08/10/2020 08:18, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/10/2020 21:12, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:40 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/10/2020 17:26, Gedare Bloom wrote: Thinking about the discussion about ordering directives in the docs, the generated header reorders

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-09 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08/10/2020 20:51, Peter Dufault wrote: I have a minor issue with the ordering. *I haven't looked too much through earlier documents.* I don't think this has anything to do with Sebastians work, but I think it is odd that "close" comes before directives like "I/O control" (or whatever it's

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-08 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:51 PM Peter Dufault wrote: > > I have a minor issue with the ordering. *I haven't looked too much through > earlier documents.* > > I don't think this has anything to do with Sebastians work, but I think it is > odd that "close" comes before directives like "I/O

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-08 Thread Peter Dufault
I have a minor issue with the ordering. *I haven't looked too much through earlier documents.* I don't think this has anything to do with Sebastians work, but I think it is odd that "close" comes before directives like "I/O control" (or whatever it's called) that need to be invoked when the

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-08 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08/10/2020 18:12, Gedare Bloom wrote: https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/doc/html/group__RTEMSAPIClassicEvent.html However, I was reviewing the doxygen output of event.h and see that it generates the bitmask macros in a strange order. I think these need to be fixed to keep them

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-08 Thread Gedare Bloom
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:35 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > The manager documentation is a consolidation of the comments in Doxygen > markup and the documentation sources in Sphinx markup. The > documentation was transfered to interface specification items. This > header file was

[PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-08 Thread Sebastian Huber
The manager documentation is a consolidation of the comments in Doxygen markup and the documentation sources in Sphinx markup. The documentation was transfered to interface specification items. This header file was generated from the items by a script. Change license to BSD-2-Clause according

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-08 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 07/10/2020 21:12, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:40 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: On 07/10/2020 17:26, Gedare Bloom wrote: Thinking about the discussion about ordering directives in the docs, the generated header reorders directives also. Is it also doing generation by

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:40 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 07/10/2020 17:26, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > Thinking about the discussion about ordering directives in the docs, > > the generated header reorders directives also. Is it also doing > > generation by alphabetical order? > > > > Should

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 07/10/2020 17:26, Gedare Bloom wrote: Thinking about the discussion about ordering directives in the docs, the generated header reorders directives also. Is it also doing generation by alphabetical order? Should we consider using the same order as defined for the API documentation? I guess

Re: [PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
it would be good to review the generated doxygen. some comments below. overall a positive improvement. On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:19 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > The manager documentation is a consolidation of the comments in Doxygen > markup and the documentation sources in Sphinx markup. The >

[PATCH v2] rtems: Generate

2020-10-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
The manager documentation is a consolidation of the comments in Doxygen markup and the documentation sources in Sphinx markup. The documentation was transfered to interface specification items. This header file was generated from the items by a script. Change license to BSD-2-Clause according