On 6/7/2023 11:59 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 5:27 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> On 6/7/2023 4:21 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> OK I will prepare something soon. I have my WIP version at
>>> https://git.rtems.org/gedare/rtems.git/tree/_clang-format?h=test-reformat
>>>
>>> I think
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 5:27 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> On 6/7/2023 4:21 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > OK I will prepare something soon. I have my WIP version at
> > https://git.rtems.org/gedare/rtems.git/tree/_clang-format?h=test-reformat
> >
> > I think the format file itself should be just about
On 6/7/2023 4:21 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> OK I will prepare something soon. I have my WIP version at
> https://git.rtems.org/gedare/rtems.git/tree/_clang-format?h=test-reformat
>
> I think the format file itself should be just about stable. I will
> make one more test and check of it within the
OK I will prepare something soon. I have my WIP version at
https://git.rtems.org/gedare/rtems.git/tree/_clang-format?h=test-reformat
I think the format file itself should be just about stable. I will
make one more test and check of it within the next few days, and then
send the patch hopefully
Hello,
even though the clang-format support for RTEMS is not yet perfect, I
think it would still make sense to already add the clang format file to
the RTEMS repository. This helps to get the currently best thing
available and for example use it for new code (BSPs).
--
embedded brains GmbH
