Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

On 16/8/19 5:26 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 15/08/2019 23:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> All I meant by "not all drivers" and "small" is that we currently do >> not include code that >> the application doesn't have a need for. I don't want that to change. >> If the application >> doesn't use

Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

On 15/08/2019 23:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > All I meant by "not all drivers" and "small" is that we currently do > not include code that > the application doesn't have a need for. I don't want that to change. > If the application > doesn't use i2c or the frame buffer, then those drivers shouldn't'

Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

All I meant by "not all drivers" and "small" is that we currently do not include code that the application doesn't have a need for. I don't want that to change. If the application doesn't use i2c or the frame buffer, then those drivers shouldn't' be there. I wasn't attempting to create a new

Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

On 12/08/2019 08:18, Chris Johns wrote: > On 12/8/19 3:51 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> >> On 12/08/2019 03:33, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 12/8/19 9:22 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 5:47 PM Chris Johns >>> > wrote: On 12/8/19

Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

On 12/8/19 3:51 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > > On 12/08/2019 03:33, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 12/8/19 9:22 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 5:47 PM Chris Johns >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 12/8/19 3:28 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> > On Sun,

Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

On 12/08/2019 03:33, Chris Johns wrote: > On 12/8/19 9:22 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 5:47 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: >> >> On 12/8/19 3:28 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 10:59 AM Christian Mauderer >

Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

On 12/8/19 9:22 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 5:47 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 12/8/19 3:28 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 10:59 AM Christian Mauderer > >

Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 5:47 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 12/8/19 3:28 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 10:59 AM Christian Mauderer > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > while mentoring Vijays GSoC project this year I noted that some > drivers > >

Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

On 12/8/19 3:28 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 10:59 AM Christian Mauderer > wrote: > > Hello, > > while mentoring Vijays GSoC project this year I noted that some drivers > in the Beagle BSPs have quite horrible hard coded values for

Re: Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 10:59 AM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Hello, > > while mentoring Vijays GSoC project this year I noted that some drivers > in the Beagle BSPs have quite horrible hard coded values for things like > pinmux initialization. Maybe it would be a nice GSoC project for next > year

Beagle: FDT support in BSP as a GSoC project?

Hello, while mentoring Vijays GSoC project this year I noted that some drivers in the Beagle BSPs have quite horrible hard coded values for things like pinmux initialization. Maybe it would be a nice GSoC project for next year to replace this stuff with a fdt based initialization. I would like to