On May 12, 2017 3:42 AM, "Chris Johns" wrote:
On 12/05/2017 18:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 12/05/17 10:35, Chris Johns wrote:
>
>> On 12/05/2017 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/05/17 17:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
>> I talked to Joel late his time yesterday and
On 12/05/2017 18:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 12/05/17 10:35, Chris Johns wrote:
On 12/05/2017 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11/05/17 17:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I talked to Joel late his time yesterday and he is reporting increased
code size and as a result some tests are not fitting
On 12/05/2017 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11/05/17 17:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Ok to
On May 11, 2017 5:09 AM, "Sebastian Huber"
> wrote:
Hello,
if someone wants to use GCC 7.1 for RTEMS 4.12, then the
On 11/05/17 17:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Ok to
On May 11, 2017 5:09 AM, "Sebastian Huber"
> wrote:
Hello,
if someone wants to use GCC 7.1 for RTEMS 4.12, then the RSB
should be updated accordingly as
Ok to
On May 11, 2017 5:09 AM, "Sebastian Huber" <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
Hello,
if someone wants to use GCC 7.1 for RTEMS 4.12, then the RSB should be
updated accordingly as soon as possible.
Chris posted a patch to bump gcc and binutils. He just needs to push it.
I had
Hello,
if someone wants to use GCC 7.1 for RTEMS 4.12, then the RSB should be
updated accordingly as soon as possible.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail :
On 09/05/17 14:54, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2017-05-03 07:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 03/05/17 03:33, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/5/17 3:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>Thoughts on upgrading the 4.12 tools?
>
Looks good with updated dependent packages for gcc and with
binutils-2.28. There
On 2017-05-03 07:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 03/05/17 03:33, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/5/17 3:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>Thoughts on upgrading the 4.12 tools?
>
Looks good with updated dependent packages for gcc and with
binutils-2.28. There are no build failures for just the tests.
On 03/05/17 03:33, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/5/17 3:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>Thoughts on upgrading the 4.12 tools?
>
Looks good with updated dependent packages for gcc and with
binutils-2.28. There are no build failures for just the tests. Attached
is the warnings report which looks good
On 3/5/17 3:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> Thoughts on upgrading the 4.12 tools?
>
Looks good with updated dependent packages for gcc and with
binutils-2.28. There are no build failures for just the tests. Attached
is the warnings report which looks good if the networking warnings are
ignored.
Hi
Thoughts on upgrading the 4.12 tools?
--joel
Forwarded Message
Subject: GCC 7.1 Released
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 10:57:28 -0500
From: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
To: g...@gcc.gnu.org <g...@gcc.gnu.org>
We are
11 matches
Mail list logo