Re: How important is Cygwin support for host tools?

I don’t know anyone that currently uses Cygwin for RTEMS development. The projects I am aware of use Linux and Linux virtual machines. At home I have been able to build RTEMS toolchains and build RTEMS using WSL, so I would use WSL before picking up Cygwin again. WSL 2.0 is supposed to improve

Re: How important is Cygwin support for host tools?

On 5/30/19 2:46 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019, 7:41 AM Jiri Gaisler > wrote: > > Does anyone still use Cygwin for RTEMS development? The reason I > ask is > that I have some portability issues for sis (no async I/O on > sockets in >

Re: How important is Cygwin support for host tools?

On 30/05/2019 14:46, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019, 7:41 AM Jiri Gaisler > wrote: > > Does anyone still use Cygwin for RTEMS development? The reason I ask is > that I have some portability issues for sis (no async I/O on sockets in >

Re: How important is Cygwin support for host tools?

On Thu, May 30, 2019, 7:46 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019, 7:41 AM Jiri Gaisler wrote: > >> Does anyone still use Cygwin for RTEMS development? The reason I ask is >> that I have some portability issues for sis (no async I/O on sockets in >> Cygwin) and I would like to avoid

Re: How important is Cygwin support for host tools?

On Thu, May 30, 2019, 7:41 AM Jiri Gaisler wrote: > Does anyone still use Cygwin for RTEMS development? The reason I ask is > that I have some portability issues for sis (no async I/O on sockets in > Cygwin) and I would like to avoid some ugly workarounds if possible. In > the age of

How important is Cygwin support for host tools?

Does anyone still use Cygwin for RTEMS development? The reason I ask is that I have some portability issues for sis (no async I/O on sockets in Cygwin) and I would like to avoid some ugly workarounds if possible. In the age of virtualization and even WSL in Win 10, do we still need Cygwin ...?