Hello Gedare,
On Thursday 23 of June 2016 17:44:13 Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This could explain a number of problems reported by students trying to
> get their RPi peripherals working. The cache manager has never been a
> robust and complete implementation. I think it must be carefully
> looked at
Hello Sebastian,
On Friday 24 of June 2016 12:49:38 Sebastian Huber wrote:
> We have two tests for the cache manager spcache01 and smpcache01. It is
> not easy to write a proper test for the cache manager, so these tests
> are far from being perfect, however they check the common cases. Every
>
On 23/06/16 17:44, Gedare Bloom wrote:
This could explain a number of problems reported by students trying to
get their RPi peripherals working. The cache manager has never been a
robust and complete implementation. I think it must be carefully
looked at across targets (easier when we delete
This could explain a number of problems reported by students trying to
get their RPi peripherals working. The cache manager has never been a
robust and complete implementation. I think it must be carefully
looked at across targets (easier when we delete obsolete
architectures!).
It looks like
Hello all,
I have checked how are rtems_cache_* operations implemented/linked
to the RTEMS RPi1 image and I have found that they are stubbed
0xad94 : bx lr
0xad98 : bx lr
RTEMS has been configured as
../../../git/rtems/configure --target=arm-rtems4.12
