Re: Project for GSoC 2020

Thanks for the feedback, I will proceed by keeping MPU implementation in mind for my proposal. On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 5:21 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 4:07 PM wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 14, 2020, at 14:22 , Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > > > Hi Utkarsh, > > > > > > On

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 4:07 PM wrote: > > > > > On Mar 14, 2020, at 14:22 , Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > Hi Utkarsh, > > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:05 PM Utkarsh Rai > > wrote: > >> > >> I am in the middle of drafting the proposal for the memory protection > >> project and specifying the

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

> On Mar 14, 2020, at 14:22 , Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Hi Utkarsh, > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:05 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: >> >> I am in the middle of drafting the proposal for the memory protection >> project and specifying the interface, one of the things I would like to take >> to your

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 03:05, Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > Before specifying the interface I want to take your kind feedback on what > all things would need to be done in the interface. > > By looking into the MMU description of ARM and x86, according to me, the > implementation would have to be

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

Hi Utkarsh, On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:05 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > I am in the middle of drafting the proposal for the memory protection project > and specifying the interface, one of the things I would like to take to your > feedback on is what are the functionalities that would be provided

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

I am in the middle of drafting the proposal for the memory protection project and specifying the interface, one of the things I would like to take to your feedback on is what are the functionalities that would be provided to the users, as some of the architectures provide a lot of support that

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

Before specifying the interface I want to take your kind feedback on what all things would need to be done in the interface. By looking into the MMU description of ARM and x86, according to me, the implementation would have to be done in two levels- 1. The architecture-specific part, wherein I

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

> On Mar 8, 2020, at 15:28 , dufa...@hda.com wrote: > > I have not gone through this thread as thoroughly as I should. Yet, I will > still jump in. > > The stack protectin mechanism should be done in a POSIX compliant way without > defining any extensions. > > When threads have protected

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

> On Mar 8, 2020, at 10:22 , Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: >> >> I suspect that the same set of APIs won't work across all architectures and >> they would need to be implemented individually for each of them and a >> separate set of

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > I suspect that the same set of APIs won't work across all architectures and > they would need to be implemented individually for each of them and a > separate set of documentation would have to be provided for all the > architectures for

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

I suspect that the same set of APIs won't work across all architectures and they would need to be implemented individually for each of them and a separate set of documentation would have to be provided for all the architectures for which the solution is implemented. If this is not implementable

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:00 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > Sorry for the late reply, I was busy with my college tests. > > I looked into the MMU implementation of a few other RTOSs and zephyr RTOS has > an interesting memory domain implementation for thread stack protection. > Basically, the

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

Sorry for the late reply, I was busy with my college tests. I looked into the MMU implementation of a few other RTOSs and zephyr RTOS has an interesting memory domain implementation for thread stack protection. Basically, the threads are grouped into memory domains as 'struct memory_domain'. Each

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

- Am 2. Mrz 2020 um 17:44 schrieb Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:37 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:12 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:05 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:37 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:12 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:05 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:33 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:58 PM Utkarsh

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:12 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:05 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:33 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:58 PM Utkarsh Rai > wrote: > >> > > >> > I have gone through the details of the

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:05 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:33 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:58 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: >> > >> > I have gone through the details of the project adding memory protection >> > using MMU and have a few questions and

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:33 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:58 PM Utkarsh Rai > wrote: > > > > I have gone through the details of the project adding memory protection > using MMU and have a few questions and observations regarding the same- > > > > 1. Is this a project for

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:58 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > I have gone through the details of the project adding memory protection using > MMU and have a few questions and observations regarding the same- > > 1. Is this a project for which someone from the community would be willing to > mentor for

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

I have gone through the details of the project adding memory protection using MMU and have a few questions and observations regarding the same- 1. Is this a project for which someone from the community would be willing to mentor for GSoC? 2. As far I could

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

Thanks, I will check it out. On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:56 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:45 PM Utkarsh Rai > wrote: > > > > Based on your feedback, adding memory protection or enhancing Wi-fi > Support in libbsd are two projects that I would like to work upon. > > > >

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:45 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > Based on your feedback, adding memory protection or enhancing Wi-fi Support > in libbsd are two projects that I would like to work upon. > > For MMU support I think a lot unmerged PowerPC code is already present, but > since I would be

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

Based on your feedback, adding memory protection or enhancing Wi-fi Support in libbsd are two projects that I would like to work upon. For MMU support I think a lot unmerged PowerPC code is already present, but since I

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:42 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > Hello everyone, > Hello Utkarsh Rai, > I would like to contribute to the Beagleboard BSP project, in particular > towards the improvement of the peripheral support. I have a few questions > pertaining to the same:- > > 1. Is adding support