On 28 May 2018 at 00:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> It sounds like great progress is being made but this thread is very long
> and I am losing track of what needs committing.
>
> We can start a new thread. :)
> Plus there is Chris' work to merge as well.
>
> How close is everything
On Mon, 28 May 2018, 00:32 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 27 May 2018, 19:59 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The support for letting users input specific symbols
>> for coverage analysis is now working in my
>>
On Sun, 27 May 2018, 19:59 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The support for letting users input specific symbols
> for coverage analysis is now working in my
> cov-tester-support branch
>
> https://github.com/thelunatic/rtems-tools/tree/cov-tester-support
>
Hello,
The support for letting users input specific symbols
for coverage analysis is now working in my
cov-tester-support branch
https://github.com/thelunatic/rtems-tools/tree/cov-tester-support
Please have a look into the code and test it.
The user can input specific symbols with the
Yeah I can see the difference in the objdump, it's optimized out though, so
not very helpful but the addresses do match the covoar output. That's with
-O2. I'll have to rebuild. Vijay you seeing the ... optimized out stuff
*
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 May 2018 at 00:33, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 1:54 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 May 2018 at 23:07, Joel
On 22 May 2018 at 00:33, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 1:54 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2018 at 23:07, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>>>
On Mon, May 21, 2018, 1:54 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 21 May 2018 at 23:07, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 May 2018 at 21:42, Joel Sherrill
On 21 May 2018 at 23:07, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 12:01 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2018 at 21:42, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
On 21 May 2018 at 21:42, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2018 at 20:37, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 May 2018 at 20:37, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 May 2018 at 17:39, Joel
On 21 May 2018 at 20:37, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2018 at 17:39, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>> CPU-rtems5-objdump
>>>
>>> sparc-rtems5-objdump worked ,
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 May 2018 at 17:39, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> CPU-rtems5-objdump
>>
>> sparc-rtems5-objdump worked , thanks .
> I can see some mismatches in the disassembly .
>
I'm building sparc
On 21 May 2018 at 17:39, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> CPU-rtems5-objdump
>
> sparc-rtems5-objdump worked , thanks .
I can see some mismatches in the disassembly .
Probably i386. Aren't you running pc386?
>
> I'm running sparc
> Not sparc/erc32 or Leon
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018, 6:35
CPU-rtems5-objdump
Probably i386. Aren't you running pc386?
Not sparc/erc32 or Leon
On Mon, May 21, 2018, 6:35 AM Cillian O'Donnell
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:18 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2018 at 16:39, Cillian
On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:18 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 21 May 2018 at 16:39, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:08 Cillian O'Donnell,
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay
On 21 May 2018 at 16:39, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:08 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian
On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:08 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay
On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 May 2018 at 02:29, Cillian
On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2018 at 02:29, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 15:35 Vijay Kumar
On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 21 May 2018 at 02:29, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 15:35 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 May 2018 at 00:53, Vijay
On 21 May 2018 at 02:29, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 15:35 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> On 20 May 2018 at 00:53, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 00:45
On Sun, 20 May 2018, 15:35 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 20 May 2018 at 00:53, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 00:45 Cillian O'Donnell,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It works.. Sorry I was using the
On 20 May 2018 at 00:53, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 00:45 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>> It works.. Sorry I was using the right covoar but the wrong rtems-test.
>> Ahh its nice to see the data back in the reports
On Sun, 20 May 2018, 00:45 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote:
> It works.. Sorry I was using the right covoar but the wrong rtems-test.
> Ahh its nice to see the data back in the reports again. Did you manage to
> track down 2 exes with the mismatch in symbol size?
>
Great! so next
It works.. Sorry I was using the right covoar but the wrong rtems-test. Ahh
its nice to see the data back in the reports again. Did you manage to track
down 2 exes with the mismatch in symbol size?
On 19 May 2018 at 13:59, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018
On 19 May 2018 at 18:28, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2018, 13:28 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> On 19 May 2018 at 17:56, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 May 2018 at 17:50, Vijay Kumar
On Sat, 19 May 2018, 13:28 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 17:56, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>> On 19 May 2018 at 17:50, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 May 2018 at 17:44, Cillian
On 19 May 2018 at 17:56, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 17:50, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>> On 19 May 2018 at 17:44, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 19 May 2018, 12:28 Vijay Kumar
On 19 May 2018 at 17:50, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 17:44, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 19 May 2018, 12:28 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 May 2018 at 16:47, Cillian
On Sat, 19 May 2018, 12:28 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 16:47, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>> God these messages again... at least I'm an expert in fixing these :)
>> Vijay I'm only seeing the headings in the report on my
On 19 May 2018 at 16:47, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
> God these messages again... at least I'm an expert in fixing these :)
> Vijay I'm only seeing the headings in the report on my end using your
> branch. How are you running it and from where? Is there any changes you
>
On 18 May 2018 at 23:24, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 03:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 19 May 2018, 03:06 Joel
On 19 May 2018 at 04:26, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> If you run nm on some of the executables, do you see the
> Is symbol? We need to.know its type.
>
I did this on the testsuites
find -iname '*.exe' -exec nm -A '{}' \; | grep '\'
which returned nothing .
am I using the right
If you run nm on some of the executables, do you see the
Is symbol? We need to.know its type.
On Fri, May 18, 2018, 5:24 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 03:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Vijay
On 19 May 2018 at 03:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 19 May 2018, 03:06 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Vijay Kumar
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2018, 03:06 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 May 2018 at 02:29,
On Sat, 19 May 2018, 03:06 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19 May 2018 at 02:29, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 May 2018 at 01:30, Cillian
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 02:29, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>> On 19 May 2018 at 01:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 14:55
On 19 May 2018 at 02:29, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 01:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 14:55 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18 May 2018 at 19:09,
On 19 May 2018 at 01:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 14:55 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 18 May 2018 at 19:09, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay
On Fri, 18 May 2018, 14:55 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
>
> On 18 May 2018 at 19:09, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 18 May 2018 at 12:30,
On 18 May 2018 at 19:09, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18 May 2018 at 12:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Cool, you should run it for the full
On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
> On 18 May 2018 at 12:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
>> Cool, you should run it for the full testsuite and take a look at that
>> report (takes a while.. around 575 tests)
>>
>>>
On 18 May 2018 at 12:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> Cool, you should run it for the full testsuite and take a look at that
> report (takes a while.. around 575 tests)
>
>>
>>> When I try to run the full testsuites it gives the following error .
What could be causing this
On Fri, 18 May 2018, 07:46 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 11:52 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 17 May 2018, 21:32 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> I have
On Fri, 18 May 2018, 11:52 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, 21:32 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> hello,
>>
>> I have attached the html report !
>>
>
> Report looks good! Well done. Was that just for samples. Did the other
On Thu, 17 May 2018, 21:32 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> hello,
>
> I have attached the html report !
>
Report looks good! Well done. Was that just for samples. Did the other
sections appear in the report if you click through the links?
Well it looks good but I
On 18/5/18 8:32 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:>
> One thing can be done, which I think will solve parsing of the absolute path
> of
> the library as well. It is to implement the the logic that Chris used in
> covoar.cc , into the python script for coverage . Then we can do an
> os.path.abspath()
hello,
I have attached the html report !
Well it looks good but I hardcoded the paths, at least that gave the proper
idea of what exactly needs to be done. Now I understand why
--rtems-builddir stayed there for a long time , it makes the job simple .
Here's a point that needs discussion :
1.
On Mon, 14 May 2018, 23:24 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2018, 09:50 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> On 14 May 2018 at 12:10, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 22:15 Vijay
On Mon, 14 May 2018, 09:50 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 14 May 2018 at 12:10, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 22:15 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 May 2018 at 02:15, Cillian
On Mon, 14 May 2018, 16:46 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
> I'll commit this once there is a log message. :)
>
You want the word 'Fix' is it?... :)
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>> ---
>> tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 10
I'll commit this once there is a log message. :)
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Cillian O'Donnell
wrote:
> ---
> tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 10 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc
On 14 May 2018 at 12:10, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 22:15 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> On 14 May 2018 at 02:15, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>> ---
>>> tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 10
On Sun, 13 May 2018, 22:15 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 14 May 2018 at 02:15, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>> ---
>> tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 10 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
On 14 May 2018 at 02:15, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> ---
> tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 10 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc b/tester/covoar/covoar.cc
> index 5c87402..c6b0589 100644
> ---
57 matches
Mail list logo