On 09.02.23 01:44, Chris Johns wrote:
On 7/2/2023 5:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06.02.23 23:09, Gedare Bloom wrote:
ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
A hint in the documentation would be helpful. Even more
On 7/2/2023 5:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 06.02.23 23:09, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
>> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
>
> A hint in the documentation would be helpful. Even more helpful would be a
> consistency
On 06.02.23 23:09, Gedare Bloom wrote:
ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
A hint in the documentation would be helpful. Even more helpful would be
a consistency check before patch sets are pulled in. For example,
On 2/6/2023 4:09 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
I'll see if I can find an appropriate place for it to go in that
document. Some parts of it are aspirational and apply to any build
ok. I'm not sure, maybe we need a note about this in
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/build-system.html
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:02 PM Kinsey Moore wrote:
>
> The objxilinxsupport build object was accidentally included twice in
> some of the ZynqMP BSPs by two different drivers that
