Re: Cygwin tools failure

2022-10-13 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 5:32 PM Ryan Long wrote: > > On 10/12/2022 7:43 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 12/10/2022 3:24 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > >> Consider a patch to add the piece removed at the end of this patch as > approved. > > I see the patch was pushed, thanks. The RSB hash will need to be

Re: Cygwin tools failure

2022-10-13 Thread Ryan Long
On 10/12/2022 7:43 PM, Chris Johns wrote: On 12/10/2022 3:24 pm, Chris Johns wrote: Consider a patch to add the piece removed at the end of this patch as approved. I see the patch was pushed, thanks. The RSB hash will need to be updated so users pick it up. I've sent a patch that updates

Re: Cygwin tools failure

2022-10-12 Thread Chris Johns
On 12/10/2022 3:24 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > Consider a patch to add the piece removed at the end of this patch as > approved. I see the patch was pushed, thanks. The RSB hash will need to be updated so users pick it up. Thanks Chris ___ devel mailing

Re: Cygwin tools failure

2022-10-11 Thread Chris Johns
On 12/10/2022 2:30 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:36 PM Ryan Long > wrote: > > Cygwin has been unable to build the tools for awhile. This has been due > to an array subscript being a char while building DTC. The maintainers >

Re: Cygwin tools failure

2022-10-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:36 PM Ryan Long wrote: > Cygwin has been unable to build the tools for awhile. This has been due > to an array subscript being a char while building DTC. The maintainers > didn't see an issue with the code itself, so it's going to go on being > broken for awhile I