(Adding devel back in the CC)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 1:34 AM Purva Yeshi wrote:
> Please feel free to call me Vijay :)
>
> Sure.
>
> That's great! You might be able to relate some of the documentation to the
>> riscv BSP code in the repository.
>
> Yes, and I also added examples related to risc
Hi Purva,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 3:18 PM Purva Yeshi wrote:
> Hello Sir,
>
Please feel free to call me Vijay :)
>
> Up until now, I have been studying the BSP driver documentation from
> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/bsp-howto/ . I have gained a good
> understanding of why and how t
Hello Sir,
Up until now, I have been studying the BSP driver documentation from
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/bsp-howto/ . I have gained a good
understanding of why and how target-dependent files are written.
Additionally, I am currently working on how the console and clock driver
are wri
Hi Purva,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 6:05 AM Purva Yeshi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am Purva Yeshi, I applied for the project "Add BSP for Polarfire based
> Beagle" for GSoC 2024. I proposed a project to create a BSP for the
> Beagle-V fire board from scratch. The primary objective of the project is
>
Hello Heinz,
On 11/05/2020 10:54, Heinz Junkes wrote:
The Priority_node structure was committed to the 4.10 branch of RTEMS in
December
2017 (78b867e26d score: replace current and real priority with priority node).
Do I have a possibility to know at compile time (in our case EPICS) if it is
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 9:27 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:54 AM Heinz Junkes wrote:
> >
> > The Priority_node structure was committed to the 4.10 branch of RTEMS in
> > December
> > 2017 (78b867e26d score: replace current and real priority with priority
> > node).
> >
>
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:54 AM Heinz Junkes wrote:
>
> The Priority_node structure was committed to the 4.10 branch of RTEMS in
> December
> 2017 (78b867e26d score: replace current and real priority with priority node).
>
> Do I have a possibility to know at compile time (in our case EPICS) if
Yes you may add yourself, and you should put your official proposal
into Google Melange. Please also take a look at the patch set (about
100 patches) that Daniel Hellstrom delivered recently, my comments on
them, and contact him to inquire whether/what can be done in this
direction.
Gedare
On Fri
Welcome,
You're not too late. We don't think the SMP support (broadly speaking)
is suitable for GSoC projects at this time. There might be some
specific aspects, such as SMP support for a particular platform, that
you could undertake. Another project that may be suitable and timely
could be to wor
