Re: RSB Git modified status

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 19/04/2016 02:34, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> I didn't quite follow. Is this to determine whether RSB should do >> something? > > > I am sorry, I should have provided more of a context. > >> I guess this is caused by some

Re: RSB Git modified status

On 19/04/2016 08:11, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Chris Johns wrote: This lets us know if the repo is clean or dirty and if changes have been made. It helps us support users and it can be part of the evidence in an audit. For this specific use, I

Re: RSB Git modified status

On 19/04/2016 02:34, Gedare Bloom wrote: I didn't quite follow. Is this to determine whether RSB should do something? I am sorry, I should have provided more of a context. I guess this is caused by some bootstrap or configure that creates untracked files in a repo? Yes. What does it

Re: RSB Git modified status

I didn't quite follow. Is this to determine whether RSB should do something? I guess this is caused by some bootstrap or configure that creates untracked files in a repo? What does it matter? On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment the RSB