Hi
I know this is a very old piece of code and predates printk() but should
this routine be changed to use printk()?
Is it still safe? Especially in light of SMP demands.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
On 17/03/2016 06:41, Peter Dufault wrote:
I’m answering only by looking at this email and not hunting through the
source. But if “rtems_error()” can easily be replaced by either
"fprintf(stderr, …)" or "printk()" then deprecate it with that
recommendation. I’ve often had spirited discussions
I’m answering only by looking at this email and not hunting through the source.
But if “rtems_error()” can easily be replaced by either "fprintf(stderr, …)"
or "printk()" then deprecate it with that recommendation. I’ve often had
spirited discussions with clients because I think
