On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 21/03/2016 08:13, Hesham Almatary wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure about the current Adapteva's plan to push their patches
>> upstream. Last time I contacted them, they said they have higher
>> priorities.
>
>
> Who did you talk to?
>
https://gith
On 21/03/2016 08:13, Hesham Almatary wrote:
I am not sure about the current Adapteva's plan to push their patches
upstream. Last time I contacted them, they said they have higher
priorities.
Who did you talk to?
Maybe we can take this off line and see what can be done about it.
Chris
Hi,
I am not sure about the current Adapteva's plan to push their patches
upstream. Last time I contacted them, they said they have higher
priorities.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't seem to have any luck building epiphany tools for either
> epiphany-rtems4
Hi
I don't seem to have any luck building epiphany tools for either
epiphany-rtems4.12 or epiphany-elf on the master of binutils-gdb,
gcc, and newlib. I am posting the current "add rtems" patch for
posterity. It looks like epiphany-elf isn't supported by upstream
binutils yet but it is in gdb.
--
