Re: RSB rtems-4.12 gcc-6 dependent package version numbers.

On 5/01/2016 5:03 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > I used the versions of the contrib/download_prerequisites script of the > GCC. The page https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html indicates later versions can be used. I cannot remember the reason these are selected. It may have been

Re: RSB rtems-4.12 gcc-6 dependent package version numbers.

On 05/01/16 09:45, Chris Johns wrote: On 5/01/2016 5:03 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >I used the versions of the contrib/download_prerequisites script of the >GCC. The pagehttps://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html indicates later versions can be used. I cannot remember the reason these

RTEMS SMP Status Report v2

Hello, there is a second version of an RTEMS SMP Status Report available at: http://microelectronics.esa.int/ngmp/RTEMS-SMP-StatusReportEmbBrains-2015-10.pdf -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49

Re: RTEMS SMP Status Report v2

Hi, Thanks for sharing. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > there is a second version of an RTEMS SMP Status Report available at: > > http://microelectronics.esa.int/ngmp/RTEMS-SMP-StatusReportEmbBrains-2015-10.pdf > > -- >

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

On 04/01/16 03:47, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Chris Johns > wrote: On 01/04/16 12:55, Joel Sherrill wrote: On SPARC/SIS, the main lesson I learned is that if the executable dropped to something

Re: RSB rtems-4.12 gcc-6 dependent package version numbers.

On 5/01/2016 7:48 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 05/01/16 09:45, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 5/01/2016 5:03 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> > >>> >I used the versions of the contrib/download_prerequisites script of the >>> >GCC. >> The pagehttps://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html indicates

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 04/01/16 03:47, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Chris Johns > > wrote: >> >> On 01/04/16 12:55, Joel Sherrill wrote:

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Chris Johns

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

>> It might be good to create GCI tasks for students to get RTEMS Tester >> working for a few simulator targets that are supported? >> > > I could be wrong but I think I created them for all gdb based simulators. > There is unlikely much low hanging fruit. > I just meant a task to run the Tester

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2016 4:35 AM, "Sebastian Huber" > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 04/01/16 03:47, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Chris Johns >>

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Jan 5, 2016 4:35 AM, "Sebastian Huber" > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 04/01/16 03:47, Joel Sherrill

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

On Jan 5, 2016 4:35 AM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > > On 04/01/16 03:47, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Chris Johns wrote: >> >> On 01/04/16 12:55, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> On SPARC/SIS, the

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> It might be good to create GCI tasks for students to get RTEMS Tester > >> working for a few simulator targets that are supported? > >> > > > > I could be wrong but I think I created them for all gdb based simulators. > >

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > >> >> It might be good to create GCI tasks for students to get

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> >> It might be good to create GCI tasks for students to get RTEMS Tester >> >> working for a few simulator targets that are supported? >> >> >> >

[PATCH 1/3] jmr3904.cfg: Delete old comments

--- c/src/lib/libbsp/mips/jmr3904/make/custom/jmr3904.cfg | 7 --- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/mips/jmr3904/make/custom/jmr3904.cfg b/c/src/lib/libbsp/mips/jmr3904/make/custom/jmr3904.cfg index 7468d9a..056f63c 100644 ---

[PATCH 2/3] mips/jmr3904: Add per-section compilation and linking support

The size of the sample executables without this option were: 1280281812 12224 142064 22af0 ticker.exe 5260013248192 62116f2a4 minimum.exe 11562402168 19696 1178104 11f9f8 cxx_iostream.exe 7069525908 24600 737460 b40b4 fileio.exe 2432322372 14084

[PATCH 3/3] powerpc/psim: Add per-section compilation and linking support

The size of the sample executables without this option were: 1696442260 1660528816777192 e8 ticker.exe 1254801984 1664971216777176 d8 minimum.exe 1009716 146443 1562102416777183 df cxx_iostream.exe 6918926218 16079064

Re: Many BSPs Fail to link CXX tests

The part about testing with a simulator is vague. But you can go ahead and generate tasks. Create 1 task per architecture that remains, and allow 5 instances for each. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Gedare Bloom

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mips/jmr3904: Add per-section compilation and linking support

Do you have Tester results? On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > The size of the sample executables without this option were: > > 1280281812 12224 142064 22af0 ticker.exe > 5260013248192 62116f2a4 minimum.exe > 11562402168 19696

Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/psim: Add per-section compilation and linking support

Do you have Tester results? On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > The size of the sample executables without this option were: > > 1696442260 1660528816777192 e8 ticker.exe > 1254801984 1664971216777176 d8