Re: [PATCH v2] score: Add Chain_Iterator

2016-04-18 Thread Gedare Bloom
OK thanks for the updates. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Add a chain iterator for safe iteration of chains with concurrent node > extraction. > --- > cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/chainimpl.h | 239 > +++

Re: RSB Git modified status

2016-04-18 Thread Gedare Bloom
I didn't quite follow. Is this to determine whether RSB should do something? I guess this is caused by some bootstrap or configure that creates untracked files in a repo? What does it matter? On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment the RSB

Re: RSB Git modified status

2016-04-18 Thread Chris Johns
On 19/04/2016 02:34, Gedare Bloom wrote: I didn't quite follow. Is this to determine whether RSB should do something? I am sorry, I should have provided more of a context. I guess this is caused by some bootstrap or configure that creates untracked files in a repo? Yes. What does it

GCC 6 Release Candiate

2016-04-18 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, I updated the RTEMS 4.12 RSB tool chain to use the GCC 6.1 release candidate. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-04/msg00109.html -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09

Re: GCC 6 Release Candiate

2016-04-18 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Sebastian and others, On Monday 18 of April 2016 12:49:33 Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > I updated the RTEMS 4.12 RSB tool chain to use the GCC 6.1 release > candidate. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-04/msg00109.html only for information, I have updated my local toolchain build

moxie C++ GCC PR and patch

2016-04-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Just a note that I have a patch for the moxie and a ticket filed with GCC https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70720 The issue goes back at least to 4.9. --joel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

Re: RSB Git modified status

2016-04-18 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 19/04/2016 02:34, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> I didn't quite follow. Is this to determine whether RSB should do >> something? > > > I am sorry, I should have provided more of a context. > >> I guess this is caused by some

Re: RSB Git modified status

2016-04-18 Thread Chris Johns
On 19/04/2016 08:11, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Chris Johns wrote: This lets us know if the repo is clean or dirty and if changes have been made. It helps us support users and it can be part of the evidence in an audit. For this specific use, I

Re: GCC 6 Release Candiate

2016-04-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
Using my rtems.org email this time so the entire list sees this. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote: > Hello Sebastian and others, > > On Monday 18 of April 2016 12:49:33 Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I updated the RTEMS 4.12 RSB tool chain to