It seems that the BSP builder doesn't build the x86_64 architecture. If
I build it by hand, on my system it fails with:
gmake[5]: Entering directory
'/build/git-build/b-all-x86_64-5/x86_64-rtems5/c/amd64/testsuites/samples'
x86_64-rtems5-gcc -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=large -Werror=return-type
This is an example test using the T Test Framework. It tests also the
framework itself.
Add T_FILE_NAME command line define to get rid of the full file path.
This is important to reduce the read-only data of test files and make
them build system independent.
Update #3199.
---
One reason to move the test support into a dedicated library are the
standard output __wrap_*() functions. They may conflict with
application level wrappers.
Update #3199.
---
cpukit/Makefile.am | 14 +-
cpukit/{libmisc/testsupport =>
---
tester/rtems/testing/bsps/leon2-sis.ini | 2 +-
tester/rtems/testing/bsps/leon3-sis.ini | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/leon2-sis.ini
b/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/leon2-sis.ini
index 61205ad..d0dd315 100644
---
I don't think this patch is necessary, the -r option is already present
and does not need to be duplicated.
Jiri.
On 2019-03-14 14:21, Joel Sherrill wrote:
---
tester/rtems/testing/bsps/leon2-sis.ini | 2 +-
tester/rtems/testing/bsps/leon3-sis.ini | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+),
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:22 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_edit.c | 9 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_edit.c
> b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_edit.c
> index 079e9ff..e43ff68 100644
> ---
Do we also want to document the adhoc testsuite here?
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:23 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> This patch adds a "Software Test Framework" to the "RTEMS Software
> Engineering" handbook. A PDF document with this patch can be viewed here:
>
>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:42 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 14/03/2019 14:31, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > Do we also want to document the adhoc testsuite here?
>
> For our pre-qualification project we need also a documentation about the
> test suites. I think
Hello,
I am about to update the Doxygen Recommendations in the RTEMS Software
Engineering handbook. Currently, there is a lot of other content mixed
in such as "BSP Basics". We should really try to avoid all the
duplication across the documentation set which is simply not
maintainable. What
On 14/03/2019 14:31, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Do we also want to document the adhoc testsuite here?
For our pre-qualification project we need also a documentation about the
test suites. I think this should go into a separate chapter or document.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:39 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:53 AM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am about to update the Doxygen Recommendations in the RTEMS Software
>> Engineering handbook. Currently, there is a lot of
Thank you Jonathan patches applied and tickets have closed properly.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:12 PM Jonathan Brandmeyer <
jbrandme...@planetiq.com> wrote:
> I apologize for the vagueness - It isn't clear which one is supposed
> to go against which branch. The only distinguishing feature is
On 14/03/2019 14:22, Joel Sherrill wrote:
_Assert( baud_number != 0 );
+ /*
+ * POSIX says baud rate of zero is a request to hang up or disconnect.
+ * This is not supported by this driver.
+ */
+ _Assert( baud_number != 0 );
Duplicate assert.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:22 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c | 13 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c b/cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c
> index 71d5f85..3275e5f 100644
> ---
---
cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_edit.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_edit.c b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_edit.c
index 079e9ff..e43ff68 100644
--- a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_edit.c
+++ b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_edit.c
@@
---
cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c b/cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c
index 71d5f85..3275e5f 100644
--- a/cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c
+++ b/cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c
@@ -149,18 +149,15 @@
---
bsps/shared/dev/serial/z85c30.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsps/shared/dev/serial/z85c30.c b/bsps/shared/dev/serial/z85c30.c
index 55df9d3..d1f4a6f 100644
--- a/bsps/shared/dev/serial/z85c30.c
+++ b/bsps/shared/dev/serial/z85c30.c
@@ -456,6 +456,15 @@
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:53 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am about to update the Doxygen Recommendations in the RTEMS Software
> Engineering handbook. Currently, there is a lot of other content mixed
> in such as "BSP Basics". We should really try
Hey!
It seems like the RSB patch for crt[i/n] was mistakenly taken out
along with other stuff:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/commit/?id=258129e140a2f0c7f579492bda2a86c6c1b93080
I'm on a new computer where I'll have to compile git from source to
use `send-email` to send the patch, so
Quick note; I'm not at the computer, but I haven't tested with the RTEMS 6
buildsets - I can do that tomorrow too.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 10:52 PM Amaan Cheval wrote:
> Hey!
>
> It seems like the RSB patch for crt[i/n] was mistakenly taken out
> along with other stuff:
>
>
Hi
Sebastian mentioned that x86_64 gcc is missing crti/n. I looked on the
GCC master and the code is in libgcc/config.host. This is in
libgcc/config.host on the master. I am assuming it isn't in gcc 7.4.0
and the RSB is missing a patch.
x86_64-*-elf* | x86_64-*-rtems*)
It's always good to discuss old project ideas and make sure they are still
sane and useful.
On the POSIX Compliance, I am make sure it is said publicly that methods
included in
FACE Technical Standard profiles that are missing are the highest priority
to add. And
this is documented in the
I will double check that it works without.
Thanks.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:44 AM Jiri Gaisler wrote:
> I don't think this patch is necessary, the -r option is already present
> and does not need to be duplicated.
>
> Jiri.
>
> On 2019-03-14 14:21, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > ---
> >
I already checked it in, it did build fine.
- Joel Sherrill schrieb:
> Definitely fixes. Posting patch now.
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:49 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> > LOL. I thought i would fix it while you were asleep. I have a build now.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:46 PM
Definitely fixes. Posting patch now.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:49 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> LOL. I thought i would fix it while you were asleep. I have a build now.
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:46 PM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>> - Am 14. Mrz 2019 um
---
rtems/config/5/rtems-x86_64.bset | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/rtems/config/5/rtems-x86_64.bset b/rtems/config/5/rtems-x86_64.bset
index 2d6ff5f..bbcd7ca 100644
--- a/rtems/config/5/rtems-x86_64.bset
+++ b/rtems/config/5/rtems-x86_64.bset
@@ -3,3 +3,12 @@
On Fri, 15 Mar, 2019, 12:27 AM Joel Sherrill It's always good to discuss old project ideas and make sure they are still
> sane and useful.
>
Yes I agree, I meant for GSoC I am focusing on "POSIX Compilance"
But any project ideas, old/new, always trigger my curiosity, the reason I
asked it in the
27 matches
Mail list logo
