Re: [rtems commit] Add a parallel bootstrap command.

2019-09-05 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Joel, I may have time to work on a new build system later this year. So, I would not put too much work into the existing solutions. - Am 5. Sep 2019 um 14:51 schrieb joel j...@rtems.org: > Hi > > Any chance, the parallel version will ever functionally replace bootstrap? > It needs

Re: [PATCH] record: Add support for interrupt handlers

2019-09-05 Thread Peter Dufault
Don’t take it too far off-line, I want to follow. But do take it out of “support for interrupt handlers…”. > On Sep 5, 2019, at 01:29 , Chris Johns wrote: > > I think we can take C++ development styles offline and chat personally, maybe > in > person soon. :) Peter - Peter

Re: [rtems commit] Add a parallel bootstrap command.

2019-09-05 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Any chance, the parallel version will ever functionally replace bootstrap? It needs -c to clean and -H for headers.am. If we want to support exactly the same arguments (I don't care beyond functionality). usage: bootstrap [-c|-h|-H] [-q][-v] options: -c .. clean, remove all

Re: [PATCH] Add lvgl_hello: Sample Hello world app using littleVGL and libbsd

2019-09-05 Thread Christian Mauderer
Sorry for the late reply. This mail slipped my attention. On 03/09/2019 08:22, Chris Johns wrote: > On 3/9/19 3:30 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> On 03/09/2019 01:46, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 2/9/19 5:42 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 4:34 AM Chris Johns >>>

Re: [PATCH] update rtems_waf

2019-09-05 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:00 PM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Vijay, > > from the content I assume that's for rtems-examples. > > Out of curiosity: Is there some specific problem that is solved with > that patch or is it just to be on the latest

Re: [PATCH] update rtems_waf

2019-09-05 Thread Christian Mauderer
Hello Vijay, from the content I assume that's for rtems-examples. Out of curiosity: Is there some specific problem that is solved with that patch or is it just to be on the latest version? If there is a problem, it would be good to mention that in the commit message. If someone else has the same

Re: [PATCH] record: Add support for interrupt handlers

2019-09-05 Thread Sebastian Huber
- Am 5. Sep 2019 um 7:29 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: > On 5/9/19 2:42 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> - Am 5. Sep 2019 um 0:28 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: >> >>> On 4/9/19 9:46 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: [...] >>> Also it should be `std::fwrite`. >> >> Ok, it seems