Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:12 AM Chris Johns wrote: > > > On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > > On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: > > > >>> On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Source Builder: Fix UnicodeDecodeError build hang

On 7/5/20 9:37 am, Anders Montonen wrote: > This patch fixes the UnicodeDecodeError that randomly caused source > builder to hang. > > In my testing, there was no difference in performance at least under > Python 3. Have you tested python 2? I would like to explore this change on master after

[PATCH 1/2] sb/execute.py: Open subprocess I/O handles in text mode

With a UTF-8 locale, _readthread() would occasionally split a multibyte code point. When running under Python 3, this would trigger an UnicodeDecodeError, which resulted in the build hanging. Solve this issue by opening the subprocess streams in text mode, and let Python's runtime deal with the

[PATCH 2/2] sb/execute.py: Add test for _readthread() code point splitting

Signed-off-by: Anders Montonen --- source-builder/sb/execute.py | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source-builder/sb/execute.py b/source-builder/sb/execute.py index 092267b..fc379ae 100755 --- a/source-builder/sb/execute.py +++ b/source-builder/sb/execute.py @@

[PATCH 0/2] Source Builder: Fix UnicodeDecodeError build hang

This patch fixes the UnicodeDecodeError that randomly caused source builder to hang. In my testing, there was no difference in performance at least under Python 3. Anders Montonen (2): sb/execute.py: Open subprocess I/O handles in text mode sb/execute.py: Add test for _readthread() code

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:18 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 06/05/2020 11:31, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:20 PM Christian Mauderer > > > > wrote: > > > > Hello Niteesh, > > > > On 06/05/2020 10:42, Niteesh G. S.

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On 07/05/2020 06:58, Niteesh G. S. wrote: I couldn't go through it yesterday. Today I started off with building rtems6 toolchain for arm using RSB but failed. I used the following command ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix=/home/niteesh/development/rtems/6 6/rtems-arm --jobs=8 The

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:44 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 07/05/2020 06:58, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > I couldn't go through it yesterday. Today I started off with building > > rtems6 > > toolchain for arm using RSB but failed. I used the following command

[PATCH 5/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to xilinx's zedboard, a9_qemu, zc702 and zc706

From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 --- .../xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq-testsuite.tcfg| 12 .../config/xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu-testsuite.tcfg| 7 +++ .../config/xilinx_zynq_zc702-testsuite.tcfg | 7 +++ .../config/xilinx_zynq_zc706-testsuite.tcfg

[PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 --- bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg

[PATCH 1/6] testsuite: Add the BSP architecture to the include path

From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 --- testsuites/aclocal/rtems-test-check.m4 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/testsuites/aclocal/rtems-test-check.m4 b/testsuites/aclocal/rtems-test-check.m4 index a0feee5e15..99b3e31244 100644 ---

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:46 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:40 PM Niteesh G. S. > wrote: > >> This is thread is about implementing OFW functions in RTEMS as part >> of my GSoC project. I would like to start off with this part since the >> refactoring >> work will

[PATCH 6/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to beagleboneblack

From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 --- .../config/beagleboneblack-testsuite.tcfg | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagleboneblack-testsuite.tcfg diff --git a/bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagleboneblack-testsuite.tcfg

[PATCH 2/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to erc32, leon2, and leon3 BSPs

From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 --- bsps/sparc/erc32/config/erc32-testsuite.tcfg | 7 +++ bsps/sparc/leon2/config/leon2-testsuite.tcfg | 7 +++ bsps/sparc/leon3/config/leon3-testsuite.tcfg | 7 +++ bsps/sparc/sparc-testsuite.tcfg | 7 +++ 4 files changed, 28

[PATCH 3/6] libdl: Add allocator check script

From: Chris Johns Use with the trace outout to check for allocation leaks. --- cpukit/libdl/rtl-alloc-check.py | 96 + 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 cpukit/libdl/rtl-alloc-check.py diff --git a/cpukit/libdl/rtl-alloc-check.py

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:44 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Hello Niteesh, > > On 05/05/2020 19:10, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > This is thread is about implementing OFW functions in RTEMS as part > > of my GSoC project. I would like to start off with this part since the > > refactoring > > work

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On 06/05/2020 09:16, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:44 PM Christian Mauderer > wrote: > > Hello Niteesh, > > On 05/05/2020 19:10, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > This is thread is about implementing OFW functions in RTEMS as part > > of my

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On 06/05/2020 06:58, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Niteesh, > > On 05/05/2020 19:10, Niteesh G. S. wrote: >> This is thread is about implementing OFW functions in RTEMS as part >> of my GSoC project. I would like to start off with this part since the >> refactoring >> work will somewhat depend

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

Hello Niteesh, On 06/05/2020 10:42, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:46 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee > wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:40 PM Niteesh G. S. > wrote: > > This is thread is about

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:20 PM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Niteesh, > > On 06/05/2020 10:42, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:46 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 --- bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg diff --git

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 ---   bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)   create mode 100644

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 ---   bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)   create mode

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

> On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: >>> From: Chris Johns Updates #2962 ---

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On 06/05/2020 11:31, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:20 PM Christian Mauderer > > wrote: > > Hello Niteesh, > > On 06/05/2020 10:42, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:46 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee >