On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 9:04 PM Niteesh G. S. wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:50 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:30 AM G S Niteesh Babu
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > This patch adds asserts to fix coverity defects
>> > 1) CID 1474437 (Out-of-bounds access)
>> > 2) CID
ok
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:07 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
> ---
> cpukit/Makefile.am | 43 ---
> cpukit/configure.ac | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/Makefile.am b/cpukit/Makefile.am
> index
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:59 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:14 AM Robin Müller
> wrote:
> >
> > I replaced the file in rtems_waf manually but it still throws the same
> > error:
> >
> > [1/2] Compiling build/conf_check_995d7bdd1834199278843e9a51c37759/test.c
> >
> >
ok
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:02 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Replace copy and paste with a provide a proper description.
> ---
> c-user/config/bsp-related.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/c-user/config/bsp-related.rst
Replace copy and paste with a provide a proper description.
---
c-user/config/bsp-related.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c-user/config/bsp-related.rst b/c-user/config/bsp-related.rst
index 4b6848d..45f31a8 100644
--- a/c-user/config/bsp-related.rst
+++
Hesham, please review. I'm not certain.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 7:23 AM Somesh Deshmukh
wrote:
>
> - Parsing the sub-node should be available generic not specific to Freedom
> Arty310 board. If we remove the Freedom Arty macro now, it will lose
> backward compatibility.The proposed change
looks good. someone using riscv can build/test and push, any takers?
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 7:55 AM Somesh Deshmukh
wrote:
>
> - The current startup sequence performs the call to the bsp_fdt_copy() and
> then
> performs memset to the BSS region. In bsp_fdt_copy(), RTEMS allocates
> memory
This may reduce the code size a bit.
---
cpukit/Makefile.am | 3 +-
cpukit/include/rtems/score/threadimpl.h | 7
cpukit/posix/src/pthreadself.c | 32 ---
cpukit/rtems/src/taskself.c | 28 -
cpukit/score/src/threadselfid.c
ok
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:18 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> This may reduce the code size a bit.
> ---
> cpukit/Makefile.am | 3 +-
> cpukit/include/rtems/score/threadimpl.h | 7
> cpukit/posix/src/pthreadself.c | 32 ---
>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:13 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> ok
>
Pushed. Thanks.
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:07 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >
> > ---
> > cpukit/Makefile.am | 43 ---
> > cpukit/configure.ac | 1 -
> > 2 files changed, 44
ok
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:30 PM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> If only one constraint is present, then use a single sentence, otherwise
> use a list for the constraints. Format the constraints so that the line
> length limit is maintained.
> ---
> c-user/config/bdbuf.rst | 94
---
cpukit/Makefile.am | 43 ---
cpukit/configure.ac | 1 -
2 files changed, 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/Makefile.am b/cpukit/Makefile.am
index b0df610bed..44ab945778 100644
--- a/cpukit/Makefile.am
+++ b/cpukit/Makefile.am
@@ -1372,15 +1372,6 @@
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:14 AM Robin Müller wrote:
>
> I replaced the file in rtems_waf manually but it still throws the same error:
>
> [1/2] Compiling build/conf_check_995d7bdd1834199278843e9a51c37759/test.c
>
> ['C:/Users/Robin/Documents/RTEMS/rtems-tools/rtems/6/bin/sparc-rtems6-gcc.exe',
>
On 29/04/2021 20:12, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I'm not so ok because now the score has symbols for the Classic API
and pthreads in it.
The point of putting a method shared by both in the score was to avoid
contaminating the score with information about the APIs or the the
APIs with knowledge of
On 29/04/2021 20:18, Hesham Almatary wrote:
I would place the device tree in a noinit section.
That is probably a better solution.
It should also be documented in this start.S file what are the
assumptions about parameters coming from the bootloader since it is
not obvious.
+1
The recent
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:37 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 29/04/2021 20:12, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> > I'm not so ok because now the score has symbols for the Classic API
> > and pthreads in it.
> >
> > The point of putting a method shared by both in the
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 15:23, Somesh Deshmukh
wrote:
>
> - Parsing the sub-node should be available generic not specific to Freedom
> Arty310 board. If we remove the Freedom Arty macro now, it will lose
> backward compatibility.The proposed change will retain the backward
> compatibility
On 30/4/21 5:01 am, Robin Müller wrote:
> Yes that is the prefix. The rtems.h file is definitely located at the location
> in the warning and it works on older commit of rtems_waf (where gccdeps.py is
> not used).
> I briefly looked through the gccdeps.py file and it is doing some string
>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:53 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
>
> On 28/04/2021 15:55, Somesh Deshmukh wrote:
> > +/* Clear .bss */
> > +LADDRa0, bsp_section_bss_begin
> > +li a1, 0
> > +LADDRa2, bsp_section_bss_size
> > +call memset
> > +
> > #ifdef BSP_START_COPY_FDT_FROM_U_BOOT
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 20:07, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:53 AM Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 28/04/2021 15:55, Somesh Deshmukh wrote:
> > > +/* Clear .bss */
> > > +LADDRa0, bsp_section_bss_begin
> > > +li a1, 0
> > > +LADDRa2,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:59 PM Hesham Almatary <
hesham.almat...@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 15:23, Somesh Deshmukh
> wrote:
> >
> > - Parsing the sub-node should be available generic not specific to
> Freedom
> > Arty310 board. If we remove the Freedom Arty macro now, it
Hi all,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:01 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> On 30/4/21 5:01 am, Robin Müller wrote:
> > Yes that is the prefix. The rtems.h file is definitely located at the
> > location
> > in the warning and it works on older commit of rtems_waf (where gccdeps.py
> > is
> > not used).
>
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 15:55, Somesh Deshmukh
wrote:
>
> - The current startup sequence performs the call to the bsp_fdt_copy() and
> then
> performs memset to the BSS region. In bsp_fdt_copy(), RTEMS allocates
> memory for bsp_fdt_blob into BSS region which is yet to initialize. With
>
On 28/04/2021 15:55, Somesh Deshmukh wrote:
+/* Clear .bss */
+LADDR a0, bsp_section_bss_begin
+li a1, 0
+LADDR a2, bsp_section_bss_size
+call memset
+
#ifdef BSP_START_COPY_FDT_FROM_U_BOOT
mv a0, a1
callbsp_fdt_copy
#endif
How did you test this? The above
I'm not so ok because now the score has symbols for the Classic API and
pthreads in it.
The point of putting a method shared by both in the score was to avoid
contaminating the score with information about the APIs or the the APIs
with knowledge of each other. I think we still need separate files
Yes that is the prefix. The rtems.h file is definitely located at the
location in the warning and it works on older commit of rtems_waf (where
gccdeps.py is not used).
I briefly looked through the gccdeps.py file and it is doing some string
stripping operations.
Maybe that is the issue but I am
I replaced the file in rtems_waf manually but it still throws the same
error:
[1/2] Compiling build/conf_check_995d7bdd1834199278843e9a51c37759/test.c
['C:/Users/Robin/Documents/RTEMS/rtems-tools/rtems/6/bin/sparc-rtems6-gcc.exe',
'-mcpu=cypress',
Am 29.04.21 um 00:54 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Chris Johns wrote:
On 29/4/21 3:00 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:49 AM Christian Mauderer wrote:
Hello Vijay,
On 28/04/2021 18:25, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
On Wed, Apr
On 29/4/21 4:30 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Am 29.04.21 um 00:54 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee:
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29/4/21 3:00 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:49 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
