On 10/31/2014 11:05 AM, Alan Cudmore wrote:
> I'm going to try to look at the Pi BSP warnings soon. I can try to
> help address some of the issues with this patch as well.
>
Once you figure the warning out, I hope it is easy to fix the other
two BSPs with the same issue. :)
> What is the desired c
I'm going to try to look at the Pi BSP warnings soon. I can try to help
address some of the issues with this patch as well.
What is the desired cut off date for 4.11?
Alan
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Andre,
>
> On Friday 31 of October 2014 12:56:40 Andre Marques
Hello Chris and Sebastin,
thanks much for fast response.
On Friday 31 of October 2014 07:57:29 Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello Pavel,
>
> On 31/10/14 02:04, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> > I am starting to test GCC-4.9.2 toolchain with actual RTEMS
> > and I have noticed that when I use actual Newlib GIT
>
Hello Andre,
On Friday 31 of October 2014 12:56:40 Andre Marques wrote:
> +/**
> + * @brief Generic ISR that clears the event register on the Raspberry Pi
> and calls + *an user defined ISR.
> + *
> + * @param[in] arg Void pointer to a handler_arguments structure.
> + */
> +static void ge
Aditional documentation can be found in the RTEMS wiki
http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/Raspberry_Pi_BSP_Peripherals
and on my GSOC development blog
http://asuolgsoc2014.wordpress.com/2014/08/18/testing-the-project/
Device drivers and test cases used to test this work were moved to a github
