Re: Is there plan for stable 4.10.3 release branching?

2014-11-06 Thread Chris Johns
On 7/11/2014 4:05 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: Also Chris has RSB support for 4.10 tools so he should also comment to make sure he thinks it is ready. The 4.10 released binaries still exist and I have fixed all reported 4.10 issues. This will also be a good exercise for the new hosting. Ye

Re: 4.11 Branching To Do

2014-11-06 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Gedare, On 06/11/14 14:57, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello, I have a new item for the list: Very desirable == + Since red-black trees are now used to implement the priority queues and they will play an important part in futu

Re: RTEMS+LWIP for LPC1768 BSP

2014-11-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 11/4/2014 3:01 PM, Marcos Díaz wrote: > Hi! > We are currently using a LWIP implementation on the Beagle Bone Black > bsp, recently uploaded by Ben Gras. > We developed this port based on ethernet and lwip drivers from > StarterWare drivers of Texas Instrument. > We took this port, that was i

Run-Time Loader Build Failures v2

2014-11-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Chris' patch to rtems-tools changed the breakage landscape so I am posting a v2 of the status. + I posted a patch for a typo in libdl which lets the MIPS build libdl. Both dl01 and dl02 now fail with: mips-rtems4.11-gcc -B../../../../../csb350/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems -mips32 -G0 -msoft-

Re: Is there plan for stable 4.10.3 release branching?

2014-11-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
On November 6, 2014 10:09:52 AM CST, Pavel Pisa wrote: >Hello Joel and others, > >the discussion to branch for 4.11 release >has bring to my mind the 4.10 stable branch. >The 4.10.2 release is dated to December 2011. >There is significant amount of corrections >and updates on in the GIT and last

Is there plan for stable 4.10.3 release branching?

2014-11-06 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Joel and others, the discussion to branch for 4.11 release has bring to my mind the 4.10 stable branch. The 4.10.2 release is dated to December 2011. There is significant amount of corrections and updates on in the GIT and last two commits are almost one year old so I would expect that the c

[PATCH] libdl/.../mips/machine/elf_machdep.h: Fix typo so compiles

2014-11-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
--- cpukit/libdl/include/arch/mips/machine/elf_machdep.h | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libdl/include/arch/mips/machine/elf_machdep.h b/cpukit/libdl/include/arch/mips/machine/elf_machdep.h index d27d431..26700ce 100644 --- a/cpukit/libdl/include/

Re: 4.11 Branching To Do

2014-11-06 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote: > On Thursday 06 of November 2014 14:57:18 Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> Pavel posted about a generic tree framework: >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.rtems.devel/1327 >> >> I had some trouble getting inlining to work in the way that tree works

Re: 4.11 Branching To Do

2014-11-06 Thread Pavel Pisa
On Thursday 06 of November 2014 14:57:18 Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Pavel posted about a generic tree framework: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.rtems.devel/1327 > > I had some trouble getting inlining to work in the way that tree works > (in the short time I spent on it): > http://permalink.gma

Re: Test failures on arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu

2014-11-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
On November 6, 2014 8:00:26 AM CST, Gedare Bloom wrote: >On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> On 06/11/14 13:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: I think it is preferable to turn this top test into a >non-interactive test. >>> >>> Have you run it? >>> >>> There is no wa

Re: Test failures on arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu

2014-11-06 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/11/14 13:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >>> I think it is preferable to turn this top test into a >>> >non-interactive test. >> >> Have you run it? >> >> There is no way to automate checking the output. > > > In theory you could redirect

Re: 4.11 Branching To Do

2014-11-06 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > I have a new item for the list: > > Very desirable > == > > + Since red-black trees are now used to implement the priority queues and > they will play an important part in future SMP improvements I would like to > do s

Re: Test failures on arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu

2014-11-06 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 06/11/14 13:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: I think it is preferable to turn this top test into a >non-interactive test. Have you run it? There is no way to automate checking the output. In theory you could redirect the file streams and parse them. Its just a bit time consuming and there are pr

Re: Test failures on arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu

2014-11-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
On November 6, 2014 12:36:14 AM CST, Sebastian Huber wrote: >Hello Jennifer, > >yes, there are some interactive tests in the test suite, but do we >really need >new ones? Who has the time to do interactive testing? > >The other interactive tests wait some seconds for user input and >otherwise