This test fix is all right, but it is not clear why this worked before.
Something must have changed in RTEMS or the tool chain to trigger this
bug and this might be an additional problem or not.
On 15/04/15 21:21, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Abusing this topic more, this is the complete analysis. I
Hello,
my last week's email to speak up for RDUC participation did not generate
a great echo, so today we decided to cancel the RDUC2015 conference.
It seems the way we prepared the conference did not meet the community
requirements and expectations.
In the long run I would like to have a
Hello,
I wanted to build the gcc5.0.0 for the or1k without patches and it did
not work. Are there any patches missing? Below, the terminal output is
given.
*** Configuration or1k-unknown-rtems4.11 not supported
make[1]: *** [configure-gcc] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
Hi Alexander,
The current GCC upstream support for OpenRISC is obsolete, it dates
back to the old or32 port which is now replaced by or1k tools.
OpenRISC folks are working on pushing their latest GCC or1k work
upstream but they currently have some issues with FSF papers.
For RTEMS or1k port to
While cpu_self-thread_dispatch_disable_level shouldn't ever be zero, it would
be better to check it before doing the decrement.
Changes in v2:
* Modified the asserts as requested in
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-February/009821.html.
---
Do you have any intuition to answer Sebastian's concern about why this
test suddenly exposed a problem? (git-bisect?)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
---
testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h | 31 ++-
1 file changed, 26
---
testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h | 31 ++-
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h b/testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h
index 3b170bf..f879096 100644
--- a/testsuites/sptests/sp13/system.h
+++
On 4/16/2015 11:14 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Do you have any intuition to answer Sebastian's concern about why this
test suddenly exposed a problem? (git-bisect?)
No. There have been so many changes lately that I assume something got
tighter
in confdefs.h. That's usually what it is.
In general,
Hi
Has anyone seen this failure?
$ make
lt LINK vscclient
/usr/bin/ld: -f may not be used without -shared
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [vscclient] Error 1
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.comOn-Line
Hi
Is there a short howto/example for this using the new TCP/IP stack?
Luckily I have a qemu on a Fedora machine since I can't built it on
the my CentOS VM right now.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.comOn-Line Applications
ld is really ld or gold?
Version?
El 16/4/2015 18:52, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com escribió:
Hi
Has anyone seen this failure?
$ make
lt LINK vscclient
/usr/bin/ld: -f may not be used without -shared
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [vscclient] Error 1
--
Joel
11 matches
Mail list logo