Re: [PATCH] Fix exception handler for supporting FPU

2015-09-22 Thread Gedare Bloom
ping. i will try to get to this tomorrow if no one else does. On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:33 PM, sudarshan.rajagopalan wrote: > Patch attached here for ARMv7M Exception Handler. Looks like git send-email > didn't deliver the mail. Something is not quite right with

Re: [PATCH] [RTEMS] Update RTEMS thread model

2015-09-22 Thread Aurelio Remonda
> > This change to the test needs to be discussed on the appropriate GCC > mailing list with Sebastian and I cc'ed. > > How large was it? When it works? Is it on the stack? > > The size of A is 20. We tested it with 2000 and still works but not with 5 (don't know what happen in the

Re: About cache enabling in LWIP port of BBB in RTEMS

2015-09-22 Thread ragu nath
Hi Marcos, I am able to boot now. I am booting from usb. I will build lwip with latest RTEMS BSP with cache enabled. I will also enable cache in lwip options. I will test it with latest uboot & let you know. If there is any trouble, I will share the image with you Thanks, Ragunath On Tue,

Re: [PATCH] [RTEMS] Update RTEMS thread model

2015-09-22 Thread Aurelio Remonda
Thank you Sebastian! We were able to reproduce the tests. The test we were interested in was 25_algorithms/random_shuffle/moveable, this one fails, as we saw in your results (and ours as well). We debugged it and find out that all three VERIFY pass (cout of the same line gave us 1, is an equal)

Re: About cache enabling in LWIP port of BBB in RTEMS

2015-09-22 Thread Marcos Díaz
I will test it now and let you know. I forgot to tell you that i always test it booting from the sdcard. I use the script sdcard.sh from Ben Gras. Let me know if you need some help. On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:44 PM, ragu nath wrote: > Hi Marcos, > > I upgraded the image.

Re: [PATCH] [RTEMS] Update RTEMS thread model

2015-09-22 Thread Joel Sherrill
On September 22, 2015 10:01:49 AM EDT, Aurelio Remonda wrote: >Thank you Sebastian! We were able to reproduce the tests. >The test we were interested in was >25_algorithms/random_shuffle/moveable, this one fails, as we saw in >your results (and ours as