Re: [PATCH 3/3] C11 threads support

On 10/7/2015 5:04 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: I am ok with this although I would like to hear that at least RTEMS or another configuration supports or plans to support threads.h and functions. C11 says that the flag __STDC_NO_THREADS__ can be used to indicate that threads.h and the functions

Re: [PATCH] Fix exception handler for supporting FPU

On 7/10/2015 11:00 pm, Daniel Gutson wrote: > > FWIW no need from feedback from us. > Can we assume this is an ok from you? Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH] Fix exception handler for supporting FPU

On 7/10/2015 4:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 07/10/15 05:13, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 23/09/2015 11:33 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >ping. i will try to get to this tomorrow if no one else does. >> What happened to this change? > >

Re: [PATCH] Fix exception handler for supporting FPU

On 07/10/15 09:04, Chris Johns wrote: On 7/10/2015 4:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > >On 07/10/15 05:13, Chris Johns wrote: >>On 23/09/2015 11:33 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >ping. i will try to get to this tomorrow if no one else does. >>What happened to this change? >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] C11 threads support

Hello Jeff, I sent the RTEMS implementation of this API to the RTEMS list only: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-September/012597.html https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-September/012598.html It is a slight modification of the FreeBSD libstdthreads. The original FreeBSD

Re: [PATCH] Fix exception handler for supporting FPU

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 07/10/15 09:04, Chris Johns wrote: >> >> On 7/10/2015 4:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > >>> >On 07/10/15 05:13, Chris Johns wrote: >>On 23/09/2015 11:33 am, Gedare Bloom