Please consider following code as reference original code. https://github.com/punitvara/TI-Starterware
I have forked from sourceforge repo that I have already discussed. https://sourceforge.net/p/starterwarefree/code/ci/master/tree/ On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 7:44 PM, punit vara <punitv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >> On 6/05/2016 9:47 PM, punit vara wrote: >>> >>> Official TI wiki page. http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/StarterWare >>> leads me to same repo. >>> >>> If you are saying here we need to be careful than I would like to have >>> a suggestion from my mentors that from where should I copy the code ? >>> I think few days back Martin and Marcos both discussed licence issue >>> with Gedare. I hope they can help me regarding this. >> >> This is what I was after. The link is on a TI domain and as you indicate >> it does point to the SF site. >> >> Thanks for providing this. The code looks fine to me. >> >> Chris > Hi all! > > I have successfully added original Ti Starter Ware code to RTEMS. > RTEMS build is also successful with this code. > Well patch is quite big but I will reduce size as community suggests. > > Licence is added to .c file > Coding style preserved to original TI SW. > Full header file added from TI SW as it will be helpful for other BSP > development for BBB. > > Please review code and let me know the issue. > > https://github.com/punitvara/rtems_gsoc16/blob/master/pwm/patch/0001-Added-original-Ti-StarterWare-with-successful-build.patch > > This is my first patch after getting selected in GSOC'16. Any > suggestions are most welcome. > Thank you, > Punit Vara _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel