Trying to build mvme5500 "Beatnik" for 4.11, option manager (no-foobar.rel: No such file or directory) issue?

2016-09-22 Thread Peter Dufault
I’m trying to update my MVME5500 “beatnik” BSP application from 4.7 to 4.11 and when I get to the final step to link my application I get what follows. [dufault@take5 rtems]$ make powerpc-rtems4.11-g++: error: /opt/flatland/opt/rtems-4.11/powerpc-rtems4.11/beatnik//lib/no-dpmem.rel: No such

Re: [PATCH v2] [RTEMS] Always use atomic builtins for libstdc++

2016-09-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 22/09/16 15:25, Joel Sherrill wrote: /The target pattern in the commit message doesn't look right. It should be *-*-rtems* I think. It should be ok since host_os is used: # It uses the following shell variables as set by config.guess: # hostThe configuration host (full

Re: [PATCH v2] [RTEMS] Always use atomic builtins for libstdc++

2016-09-22 Thread Joel Sherrill
/The target pattern in the commit message doesn't look right. It should be *-*-rtems* I think. Do all BSPs for m68k build with C++ enabled? What code is used for atomic operations on say a 68000 or 68020? Thanks. --joel On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Sebastian Huber <

Re: [PATCH] [RTEMS] Always use atomic builtins for libstdc++

2016-09-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 22/09/16 10:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 22/09/16 09:41 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote: libstdc++-v3/ * config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h: Adjust comment. * acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_ENABLE_ATOMIC_BUILTINS): Honor explicit atomicity_dir setup via configure.host. * configure.host

[PATCH v2] [RTEMS] Always use atomic builtins for libstdc++

2016-09-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
v2: Fix shell script part since shell grouping is expressed by { }. libstdc++-v3/ * config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h: Adjust comment. * acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_ENABLE_ATOMIC_BUILTINS): Honor explicit atomicity_dir setup via configure.host. * configure.host (rtems-*): Set

Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm/tms570: include hardware initialization and selftests to run RTEMS directly from Flash without loader on TMS570LS3137 HDK.

2016-09-22 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Gedare, On Thursday 22 of September 2016 03:26:32 Gedare Bloom wrote: > I only added a couple of very minor inline comments. Looks good, I > think you can push directly no one else needs to re-read this > BSP-specific stuff. thanks much for reading that huge pieces. I have corrected some